|
|
Enron Mail |
Tony, I agree it look s fine. I've talked briefly with Glen and emailed my
thoughts to them, but haven't had a chance to walk Glen and MKM through what we discussed yesterday. DF Teb Lokey 08/16/2000 03:18 PM To: Frazier King/FGT/Enron@ENRON cc: Tony Pryor/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve Hotte/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON Subject: Re: EOL Transactions Looks good to me ,too. Frazier King 08/16/2000 03:14 PM To: Tony Pryor/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve Hotte/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Teb Lokey/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON Subject: Re: EOL Transactions Looks good. 08/15/2000 06:42 PM Tony Pryor Tony Pryor Tony Pryor 08/15/2000 06:42 PM 08/15/2000 06:42 PM To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve Hotte/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Frazier King/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Teb Lokey/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: EOL Transactions Attached is a revised draft of the text appearing with the long product description on EOL, as discussed today. The purpose of the additional paragraph is to eliminate the need for a separate submission of a request for service. Please give me your feedback/comments.
|