![]() |
Enron Mail |
Thanks Bob. I'd suggest that you handle the points in the first and second
paragraphs of your email with Gary Peng, including updating the verbiage as you deem appropriate to address the North Dakota, weather, and mileage issues. Please send to Mike Moran and myself the changes you propose (including the numbers). We have already modified the language you reference in your third paragraph (per Michele Winckowski), so that's taken care of. Mike, you or I should let Rex know that a couple of these additional tweaks are coming through this other channel. One of us can then send them directly to Rex if that would be helpful. DF From: Bob Chandler 03/08/2000 02:48 PM To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Tim Kissner/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Marsha Eurek/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Harry Walters/ET&S/Enron@Enron Subject: Re: Enron Form 10-K We'll follow-up with Gary Peng (our contact in Corporate Reporting) on the numeric data and blanks. However, for the verbiage for NNG we suggest adding North Dakota and deleting Wyoming from the list of states served outside our traditional market area. Our research last year indicated that we no longer have any facilities in Wyoming and we do have facilities at Ft. Buford, N. Dakota. This will conform to our Brown Cover footnote 1. The note in third paragraph about a warmer than normal winter in Northern's service territory in 1999 should probably be updated. The decline in volumes from 1998 to 1999 was mainly due to cooler summer weather (less a/c) in the south end of the system. We obtained this advice yesterday from Gilbert for another report requirement. Also, the reference to approximately 17,000 mile pipeline is probably a bit high. Our 1998 Form 2 reported just under 16,500 miles. This number ought to be consistent with whatever is used in the Item 2 Properties section on page 29 for the aggregate of all Enron pipelines. (I think Corporate obtains a table from the engineers for this disclosure). The fourth paragraph needs to be deleted or replaced. It appears to describe the Peak Day 2000 project which was old news in 1999.
|