|
|
Enron Mail |
Why would PGT do that???? If there was that much demand, you'd think they
would have been able to extract a neg. rate deal for something north of max for a shorter term. Maybe that shipper demanded the recourse rate. Weird. By the way--good memo to Shelley on Red Rock. df From: Jeffery Fawcett/ENRON@enronxgate on 02/22/2001 03:49 PM To: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Danny McCarty/LON/ECT@Enron, Lorna Brennan/ENRON@enronXgate, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ENRON@enronXgate, Lorraine Lindberg/Enron@enronXgate, TK Lohman/ENRON@enronxgate, Michelle Lokay/ENRON@enronXgate, Kimberly Watson/ENRON@enronXgate cc: Subject: PGT-NW expansion Rumor on the street is that the entire 200 MMcf/d of capacity in the PGT-NW expansion went to one shipper who offered max. rates for 35 years.
|