Enron Mail

From:drew.fossum@enron.com
To:steven.harris@enron.com, mary.miller@enron.com, maria.pavlou@enron.com,jeffery.fawcett@enron.com, lindy.donoho@enron.com, lorraine.lindberg@enron.com
Subject:tw indeces
Cc:donald.vignaroli@enron.com, richard.hanagriff@enron.com,susan.scott@enron.com
Bcc:donald.vignaroli@enron.com, richard.hanagriff@enron.com,susan.scott@enron.com
Date:Sun, 13 Aug 2000 05:14:00 -0700 (PDT)

Please take a look at Vig's effort to detect price arbitrage behavior on TW
using the same method that Steve Kirk used on Northern. You'll recall that
Steve's chart on Northern showed an very close correlation between the
calculated arb opportunity and the direction and size of the aggregate
customer imbalances, by month. Proving once again that TW is just a little
different, that method shows no correlation at all on TW. I agree with Vig's
conclusion that we should not use this data in the 637 filing.

I tried one alternative reading of the data to see if I could find a
correlation. Steve's method evenly weights the value of arb opportunities
that occur early and late in a month. Please tell me if you agree, marketing
folks, but I think a more logical approach would risk-weight the apparent arb
opportunites. In other words, an apparent opportunity to short TW and sell
the gas for a $.25/mmbtu profit on the 5th of a month is unlikely to generate
arb behavior because a trader has no idea on the 5th what the cash out index
will be at the end of the month. In contrast, an opportunity to make $.25 on
the 25th of a month, when a trader can calculate pretty closely what the
monthly index will be, is basically free money. Using that logic, I ignored
any apparent arb opportunites in the first half of the month. I eyeballed
the timing and size of the arb opportunites (i.e., there's a $.70-.90 arb
opportunity to short TW from the 23d to the end of May, 2000) rather than
using Steve's mathematical approach. I still didn't see the kind of
correlation I'd expect. The correlation is directionally positive in only 4
out of 12 months, and the size of the imbalances doesn't even make sense in
the months that correlate on direction. I give up, and am removing the arb
argument from the daily imbalance section of the draft. I'll route that
separately.

Thanks to Vig, Susan, Lorraine and Richard for hustling on this analysis.
"Its better to try [to find a correlation] and fail than never to try at all.
. .."
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 08/13/2000
11:55 AM ---------------------------
Donald Vignaroli 08/11/2000 04:23 PM

To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: tw indeces