|
|
Enron Mail |
The author was obviously not aware that the Enron pipelines pride themselves
in having standardized our "operational nuisances" !! df From: Dorothy McCoppin/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/22/2001 03:10 PM To: Shelley Corman/ENRON@enronXgate cc: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Robert Kilmer/ENRON@enronXgate, Janet Place/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Ray Neppl/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Maria Pavlou/ENRON@enronXgate, Susan Scott/ENRON@enronXgate, Frazier King/ENRON@enronXgate, Dari Dornan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lee Huber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON Subject: RE: Section 5 Argument of Segmentation Brief This brief is not very well written -- many legal mistakes and grammar is also really poor. Here are my questions and comments. I did, however, enjoy reading about "the unique operational nuisances of every interstate pipeline". --Dot -----Original Message----- From: Corman, Shelley Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 8:09 AM To: Fossum, Drew; Miller, Mary Kay; Kilmer III, Robert; McCoppin, Dorothy; Place, Janet; Neppl, Ray; Pavlou, Maria; Scott, Susan; King Jr., Frazier; Dornan, Dari; Huber, Lee Subject: FW: Section 5 Argument of Segmentation Brief Last brief draft for now! -----Original Message----- From: "Susan Moore" <SAM@vnf.com<@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Susan+20Moore+22+20+3CSAM+40vnf+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.c om] Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 5:12 PM To: Rnuschler@akingump.com; rmfmckinney@aol.com; mark.cook@coastalcorp.com; Clevander@columbiaenergy.com; kkrieger@columbiaenergygroup.com; Alexanderl@dsmo.com; Shelley_Corman@enron.com; hendricksond@epenergy.com; Fkelly@gbmdc.com; cdavis@glgt.com; Mike.McMahon@gulfsouthpl.com; JDRESKIN@INGAA.ORG; pludwig@INGAA.ORG; Kbdriver@jonesday.com; Paul_Mallory@kindermorgan.com; Jblasiak@mcguirewoods.com; carl.fink@neg.pge.com; marsha.palazzi@neg.pge.com; jschaefgen@reidpriest.com; Coharra@velaw.com; Hmay@velaw.com; jjohnson@velaw.com; John Burnes; Paul Korman; tiggka@wbip.com; Judy.neason@williams.com Subject: Section 5 Argument of Segmentation Brief Attached is the initial draft of the NGA Section 5 argument for the pipeline petitioners' joint brief opposing segmentation. I have attached the document in both Word and WordPerfect. The document was converted into WordPerfect from Word, which should explain any WordPerfect formatting problems. The Statement of the Case for the segmentation brief will be circulated on Tuesday morning. Susan A. Moore Associate Van Ness Feldman, P.C. 202-298-1896 - VANDOC_98238_1.DOC << File: VANDOC_98238_1.DOC << - VANDOC_98421_1.WPD << File: VANDOC_98421_1.WPD <<
|