|
|
Enron Mail |
If the cost savings are worth a little bit of hassle, we can do this. We'll
need to make a FERC filing by the end of the 1st Q 2000 to identify the "shared facilities." Also, if you decide to go forward, don't do it until 1-1-2000 so we don't have to scramble to get the info in front of FERC this quarter. Let me and Maria know what you decide to do and we'll arrange a briefing on the specific rules to be aware of and we'll make sure we understand the situation fully so we can properly disclose to FERC what is up. Please call with any questions. Thanks. DF Rich Jolly on 12/15/99 06:38:43 PM To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@Enron cc: Michel Nelson/ET&S/Enron@Enron Subject: Re: EES Drew are we OK to go with this? We don't have any "confidential transportation-related information in our office. We do have some operating agreements and contracts but they aren't confidential that I know of. Rich Drew Fossum 12/08/99 05:18 PM To: Michel Nelson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON Subject: Re: EES EES is a marketing affiliate, so we do need to be careful about shared computer systems, phone systems, staplers, paper clips, etc. If Rich and his office have no "confidential transportation-related information" we might be able to do it, otherwise, the hassles and expense of building marketing affiliate firewalls might make it counterproductive. I'm forwarding this to the experts for a quick yup or nope on this. Thanks. DF Michel Nelson 12/08/99 05:24 PM To: Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@Enron cc: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON Subject: EES Rich - Per your phone mail, I see no reason why an EES employee couldn't office in your Region Office, providing he/she pays rent and we not break any market affiliate rules (if they apply here). Drew - Saving $ for Enron. Any issues I'm overlooking? Mike
|