![]() |
Enron Mail |
Thanks Susan, that makes sense. df
Susan Scott 02/02/2001 09:20 AM To: Bob Chandler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON Subject: Re: Mavrix ...So it would not have to be disclosed in our Form 2. This was at Rod Hayslett's request (via Tracy Geaccone.) From: Bob Chandler 02/01/2001 06:08 PM To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Mavrix Don't know why I didn't think to look in Secretariat: http://home.enron.com:84/secretariat/CDS12547.htm It's currently a sub of Transwestern Pipeline Company. Is this the best positioning for legal/regulatory purposes? I liked your idea, Drew, of having it be a sub of Enron Pipeline Company. If it's a sub of TW, it'll get disclosed in the TW Form 2. I don't know whether that's a concern for you.
|