|
|
Enron Mail |
If that's all we need commercially, I'm fine with it. I'd be more
enthusiastic if we thought that their removal of the protest would clear up all FERC's issues and result in cancellation of the tech. conf. and prompt approval of the filing, but I suspect that is too much to ask for. DF From: Susan Scott 06/13/2000 02:50 PM To: Drew Fossum@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: PNM tech. conference Phil Richardson and Sarah Tomalty of Dynegy say that they would probably (i.e. subject to management approval) withdraw their protest if we would amend our proposed tariff language to limit the quantity of capacity we can acquire from PNM to 20,000/day. Their chief concern is to prevent TW from becoming simply a broker for another pipeline's capacity (which has never been our intention). Lorraine is discussing this with Steve to see whether this is something we could live with. The Commission has expressed the same concern in the past, so this might make them more comfortable with our proposal too. Comments? let me know.
|