Enron Mail

From:drew.fossum@enron.com
To:kathy.ringblom@enron.com
Subject:Re: Price Gouging
Cc:susan.scott@enron.com, michael.moran@enron.com
Bcc:susan.scott@enron.com, michael.moran@enron.com
Date:Sun, 26 Nov 2000 11:30:00 -0800 (PST)

Great job. I'll grab you and Susan Mon. AM to discuss this and her
thoughts. DF




Kathy Ringblom
11/21/2000 04:55 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Price Gouging

Drew, I will try to summarize the research I did today on the referenced
subject. The bottom line is that I did not find any California statutes that
appeare to be applicable to what we're doing. I looked at California's
General Business Regulations, Unfair Trade Practices statute, the Public
Utilities Code, an ALR annotation that discussed cases in which courts have
reviewed acts or practices prohibited by state deceptive trade practice and
consumer protection statutes, and I searched case law and statutes using
terms such as gouging, unconscionable, pricing practices, etc. The
California Unfair Practices Act is "... not a price-fixing statute, but seeks
to regulate conduct of those engaged in business in order to eliminate such
unfair practices as price discrimination indulged in for purpose of injuring
competitors or destroying competition. It does not make every difference in
price unlawful, but only those differences that cannot be justified after
proper allowance has been made for differences in grade, quality, quantity or
cost of transportation." It appears that the statutes and cases that are
anywhere close to what we're looking for deal with protection of the ultimate
consumer and not sophisticated energy companies.

I did find a price gouging statute in New York that states that its purpose
is to prohibit conduct that could occur during periods of abnormal disruption
of the market caused by strikes, power failures, severe shortages or other
extraordinary adverse circumstances when parties have taken unfair advangage
of consumers by charging grossly excessive prices for essential goods and
services. I reviewed two cases, People v. Two Wheel Corp. and State of New
York v. Strong Oil Company, that deal with a company that sold portable
electric generators at unconscionably excessive prices during a power failure
caused by a hurricane and a company that sold home heating fuel at an
unconscionably excessive price during a period of abnormal disruption of the
market, respectively. (The Strong Oil case discussed Federal pre-emption of
state law due to the Federal Emergency Petroleum Allocation Act.) I will put
copies of these cases as well as some of the other documents mentioned above
in your in-box in case you want to review them.

I looked briefly at Texas law but didn't see anything. I obviously didn't
get every state covered. If you want me to look further, please let me
know.