![]() |
Enron Mail |
I agree. This is not a big enough dollar issue for them to make a huge
stink, is it? If it is, can't we match them stink for stink with all the imbalance penalties we have forgiven in the past? DF From: Mary Kay Miller 04/21/2000 02:15 PM To: Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kent Miller cc: Mary Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Joni Bollinger/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Loren Penkava/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Larry Berger/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Pamela Carter/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON Subject: Re: UCU PPA Tiering Issue Based on the above, it seems that the decision to advise them we can't retier still stands. Isn't there a way to give them the $30,000 of value in another manner which doesn't make us file for waiver? Alternatively, we have given up more than this in the past to resolve their errors, don't adjust? We can still tell them we plan to address in our Order 637 filing- MK Lynn Blair 04/21/2000 10:07 AM To: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Joni Bollinger/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Loren Penkava/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Larry Berger/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Pamela Carter/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON Subject: UCU PPA Tiering Issue For PPA's in November, 1999, December, 1999, January, 2000 and February, 2000, the UCU issue of tiering is only with the November, 1999 PPA of $30,475.61. All other PPA's are at Tier 1. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks. Lynn
|