last year's deal

I recall that we set up a warning flag approach with market services last
year to make sure that Sempra never "goes physical" without us manning the
battle stations and deciding what to do. Do you guys know who the noms would
come in to in Market Services if Sempra ever decided to try to take their gas
out of Cunningham and move it off system? Care to venture a guess as to what
that person would do if a 100,000 nom by Sempra into an IT contract for a
haul from the Cunningham storage point to Demarc hit their desk? Sempra
couldn't nom the gas into a transport contract without first giving
Kent/Sue/Morgan a physical delivery nom under the SF agreement, correct? At
which point we would immediately nom the SBA, correct?

These issues may be important to our closing this year's deal if TCEM can't
come up with the corp. guarantee. I.e., if we can retain absolute control of
the noms, do we really have any "go physical" risk??? We need to think this
through. DF