|
|
Enron Mail |
---------------------- Forwarded by Rob G Gay/NA/Enron on 02/22/2001 04:37 AM
--------------------------- "Boehm, Barbara" <bboeh@opic.gov< on 02/21/2001 06:23:42 PM To: "'Rob.G.Gay@enron.com'" <Rob.G.Gay@enron.com< cc: "'Kluesener, Frank'" <frank.kluesener@kfw.de< Subject: RE: Commitment extension Thanks for the update. The sooner the better I think; it would be helpful for us to know what defaults exist as we assess the whole "consent" situation. Thanks Barbara -----Original Message----- From: Rob.G.Gay@enron.com [SMTP:Rob.G.Gay@enron.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 10:54 AM To: Boehm, Barbara; Kluesener, Frank Subject: Re: Commitment extension Yes, we have not been able to pull Laine and Jose away from their very important activities on the Ridges, the Siemens negotiation and the Furnas/ Brazil Inc. efforts. I think Eddie Daniels is going to try and start pulling the scedule together this week and next. Thanks for the follow up. Please let me know if the passage of time is endangering this effort. Regards, Rob "Boehm, Barbara" <bboeh@opic.gov< on 02/20/2001 05:44:24 PM To: "'rob.g.gay@enron.com'" <rob.g.gay@enron.com< cc: Subject: Commitment extension Rob I forgot to ask you about this this morning: can you please give me an update on the status of Amendment #2 (the commitment extension). I believe we are waiting for an update of the attached schedule. Thanks Barbara
|