Enron Mail

From:chris.germany@enron.com
To:victor.lamadrid@enron.com, joann.collins@enron.com, alvin.thompson@enron.com
Subject:Re: Allegany contract on CGAS
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Sun, 8 Oct 2000 04:41:00 -0700 (PDT)

I think we need to make sure we are doing a "point nom". Acually since we
don't EDI, we probably don't even need to do a point nom in Unify.
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 10/08/2000 11:40
AM ---------------------------


Brenda H Fletcher
10/03/2000 09:18 AM
To: Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alvin Thompson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Joann
Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Allegany contract on CGAS

A Service Verification is a statement created in the Settlements module of
Unify. The Volume Management group uses this statement to approve a payment
to a pipeline for a transportation related expense. The Service Verification
shows an amount calculated on quantities for a contract in Path Manager,
times a rate from either the Unify Tables or a rate on the Sitara deal
ticket. I could put a zero rate on the Sitara deal ticket to zero the
unnecessary expense out but this doesn't resolve the issue. Since we are
noming agent only, we don't want something coming across the system for
calculation of a payment. Is there a different way to handle these types of
contracts when they are being entered in Path Manager? I've heard of
something like a point nom as way to handle. Are we doing that on this
contract?



Enron North America Corp.

From: Victor Lamadrid 10/02/2000 08:12 PM


To: Brenda H Fletcher/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alvin Thompson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Joann
Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Allegany contract on CGAS

Brenda, Please explain......What's a service verification and how can we fix
this????



Brenda H Fletcher
09/22/2000 03:45 PM
To: Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Allegany contract on CGAS

We are noming agent only on Contract 37982 but a Service Verification
continues to be drafted in Settlements. How can we stop this from occuring?

Thanks,
Brenda