|
|
Enron Mail |
This capacity is in ENA's name and we have been billing CES the demand charge
since January. The MDQ is 2300. Thanks Joanie! ---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 04/26/2000 11:07 AM --------------------------- Joan Veselack@ENRON 04/26/2000 10:21 AM To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON@ECT Subject: Re: Titanium Metals capacity It's contract 64939, term = 10/1/1999 to 9/30/2000. Chris Germany@ECT 04/26/2000 09:59 AM To: Joan Veselack/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Titanium Metals capacity Do you guys know which contract this is? ---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 04/26/2000 09:58 AM --------------------------- From: Colleen Sullivan 04/25/2000 08:24 AM To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Mark Breese/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Titanium Metals capacity Chris--see Melissa's note below.....per her note it would appear that part of the capacity we valued in the Wholesale book (not Retail) was not really capacity they owned. Can you give me the details on this capacity--what term they gave it to us for, rate, receipt and delivery points, volume, etc. Then we need to look at what impact it will have to take it out of the book. Thanks for the help. ---------------------- Forwarded by Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT on 04/25/2000 08:21 AM --------------------------- mflewellyn@columbiaenergygroup.com on 04/24/2000 03:46:16 PM To: " - *colleen.sullivan@enron.com" <colleen.sullivan@enron.com< cc: Subject: Titanium Metals capacity Colleen, As I understand it, we were acting as Agent for TCO capacity owned by Titanium Metals, and that capacity was incorrectly incorporated into the sale of our Wholesale book. Could you please look into this on your end and let me know how to best proceed with correcting this situation. Thanks, Melissa (703-561-6408)
|