Enron Mail

From:chris.germany@enron.com
To:colleen.sullivan@enron.com, dan.junek@enron.com, judy.townsend@enron.com,scott.goodell@enron.com
Subject:Re: Transport P&L
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Tue, 16 May 2000 05:20:00 -0700 (PDT)

We can use it as far as I'm concerned. Have the reimbursements been
addressed?





From: Colleen Sullivan 05/16/2000 08:18 AM


To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy
Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Transport P&L

I need to know WHY you all are still uncomfortable using the service p&l, at
least for demand charges. Please advise.


---------------------- Forwarded by Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT on 05/16/2000
08:18 AM ---------------------------
To: Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Transport P&L


Colleen,

The main reason I am uncomfortable about using the service p&l is because
Chris, Dan, and Judy are uncomfortable with it. As soon as they are happy
with it, we are ready to use it.

David



To: David Oliver/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Transport P&L

David--
Why are you still not comfortable using the service p&l, at least for demand
charges?
What system resources are you talking about?




To: Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Transport P&L


Colleen,

I think the reason that they haven't moved has been one of timing. Chris has
not had time to pull them out of their spreadsheets and put them onto
another. This, of course, has led to the obvious point that we are still not
comfortable using the service P&L from unify. When Scott gets back next
week, we will together with him and Dick to verify what needs to be moved and
take care of it manually until system resources can handle it.

David






From: Colleen Sullivan 05/03/2000 10:07 AM


To: David Oliver/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Transport P&L

David
Is there some reason why we are not allocating demand charges for the market
area pipes to the Market East p&l? If the only reason is that you're not
sure which ones to do, this is my suggestion. It seems to me that there are
only three pipelines where there is overlap and that would be Tennessee,
Texas Eastern and Transco. For now, why don't we leave all the demand
charges for those three pipes, plus all others not listed below, with the
East p&l, and move the following pipe demand charges to the Market East
book: Algonquin, Columbia Gas Transmission, Columbia Natural Resources, CNG,
Cove Point, Equitrans, Gatherco, Iroquois, Marco, National Fuel.

Obviously you need to confirm this with Dick and Scott, but this seems to
make sense to me. Please advise.