|
|
Enron Mail |
Thanks for all the information--I think! I'm just beginning to go through
it, but wanted to let you know who's doing what over here, so you know who you'll be hearing from and who's really important in transitioning these contracts to Enron. I am responsible for only the initial evaluation of the contracts and making sure they get assigned, etc. The really important people in this process are: Robin Barbe, who is the commercial person responsible for the ongoing service to these customers; Joan Veselack who will be the scheduling person; Dick Jenkins--Robin's backup; Also, although Robin will be talking to CALP about renewing transportation, etc., Chris Germany is the transportation specialist if there is a particular transport question that needs answering. Phone numbers for all of your contacts at ENA are as follows: Robin Barbe Commercial Issues, including Transportation Renewal 713/853-7177 Joan Veselack Scheduling 713/853-1608 Dick Jenkins Back up Commercial contact 713/853-5136 Chris Germany CALP transportation calculation issues 713/853-4743 Colleen Sullivan The "issues" person--if you just can't get ahold of anyone or 713/853-5514 for "issues" that don't seem to be getting resolved. Obviously we need to get all of this information to CALP / GELP. I'll let Robin decide how she wants those communications to occur. I really just wanted to let you know that you'll be hearing from Robin soon to discuss the contracts in more detail. Also, the most important request I have right now: WOULD YOU PLEASE RE-SEND THE E-MAIL AND ADDRESS IT TO: robin.barbie@enron.com; joan.veselack@enron.com; dick.jenkins@enron.com; chris.germany@enron.com; and scott.neal@enron.com? I tried to forward the e-mail, but apparently you have some secret encryption codes so it wouldn't allow me to forward it. Thanks for your help and I'm sure you'll hear from us very soon with questions. In fact, I have one question already. Your summary of the CALP contract shows it is under a year to year arrangement, but the amendment I see (#1) indicates it is under two month period extensions and may be terminated with 60 days notice. Which is correct ? Has there been another amendment bringing it back to a year to year extension, or was the summary an old document?
|