|
|
Enron Mail |
---------------------- Forwarded by Angie Zeman/Corp/Enron on 08/02/2000=20
09:34 AM --------------------------- To: Beverly Beaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joann=20 Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Angie Zeman/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: =20 Subject: Appalachian Update & Scheduled 8/15/00 Meeting FYI....... ---------------------- Forwarded by Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT on 08/02/2000= =20 09:28 AM --------------------------- MARY THERESA FRANKLIN 08/02/2000 09:24 AM To: Nelson Ferries/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryce=20 Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gloria G=20 Barkowsky/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wade R Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, LaShanda=20 Poledore/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James T Javins/DUB/EES@EES, Jeanne=20 Wukasch/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fred=20 Lagrasta/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT=20 Subject: Appalachian Update & Scheduled 8/15/00 Meeting After reviewing the Action Items from 07/17/2000 and more thoroughly=20 analyzing the =01&validation task=018 assigned to John Singer and myself, w= e have=20 changed our approach. Instead, I recruited Jeanne Wukasch to help pull=20 together a more effective strategy and assist with the cleanup process. We= =20 are calling on Jim Javin and John Singer to rule only on exceptions or=20 conflicts in data. Also, we are meeting with Logistics and IT to establish = a=20 workable solution to clear-up paths with more than one deal. Our review of= =20 the Appalachian data is based primarily on wellhead activity from the=20 following sources: Path Manager Supply =01) This gives us the ability to sort data easily, pro= vide=20 views of deals and path relationships. This screen allows us to identify= =20 duplicate deals under the same meter and incorrect trading desk assignments= . =20 We can also trace purchase information to the transport detail. Unify Transaction List =01) This is an extract of Apr-00 production data ou= t of=20 Unify Purchase and Transport files. This list permits us to compare purcha= se=20 price deducts vs. transport payments by meter. (Manual payments and the=20 inconsistencies in the Unify set-up of pipe structures will require=20 additional effort in this area.) The end result of our efforts will provid= e: a deal reference for meters listed more than once consolidation of wellhead deals by pipe correct Market East regional designation purchase deducts not corresponding to pipeline payments meters without purchase payments incorrect price adjustments for transport cost A status update has been scheduled for August 15 at 1 PM in room EB 3014. = =20 Our goal is to have completed Gatherco and CNR wellheads. To date our=20 progress has revealed: Meters with multiple deals 73 Meters not on Market East deals 167 Different counter-parties with the same meter 13 Deducts missing from the purchase price 47 Purchase prices with incorrect deducts 85 Meters missing purchase expense 16 =09=09 =09=09 =09=09 =09=09 =09=09 =09=09 =09=09
|