|
|
Enron Mail |
Sent a retro request to TCO last week with two options:
1) Inject into storage from CES IPP pool, which was long that day. 2) In ground storage transfer from Dayton's FSS storage to CES's FSS storage. Dayton has given Enron the approval to move this storage. I told TCO the second option would be the most viable option, and it should not comprise TCO's position with its other shippers. As of right now, TCO has put all retro requests on hold. The bills will probably go out with these penalties on it. However, TCO will revisit the penalty issue, once the dust has settled. We are not the only shipper that incurred penalties, and TCO wants to treat everyone fairly. I did tell TCO to remember that Enron is not an affiliate, and TCO needs to treat Enron as TCO would its other shippers. mflewellyn@columbiaenergygroup.com on 01/31/2000 09:25:47 AM To: Joan Veselack/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: " - *Destephanis, Kara" <kdestep@columbiaenergygroup.com<, " - *Stiles, Marianne" <mstiles@columbiaenergygroup.com<, " - *Swogger, Joanne" <jswogge@columbiaenergygroup.com<, Subject: Re: TCO STOW Overage - 1/24 - NEED ANSWER Responding to your question below, yes we do need the enduser gas. Please let me know the final outcome on this. Joan_Veselack@enron.com on 01/29/2000 12:52:23 AM Please respond to Joan_Veselack@enron.com To: Melissa Flewellyn/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS cc: Subject: Re: TCO STOW Overage - 1/24 - NEED ANSWER Found your e-mail address. FYI. ---------------------- Forwarded by Joan Veselack/Corp/Enron on 01/29/2000 11:49 AM --------------------------- Joan Veselack 01/29/2000 10:35 AM To: bperrone@columbiaenergy.com, mstiles@columbiaenergygroup.com, hboyd@columbiaenergygroup.com, kdestep@columbiaenergygroup.com cc: knovsek@columbiaenergygroup.com, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Hendrickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: TCO STOW Overage - 1/24 - NEED ANSWER (Document link: Joan Veselack) What's the final answer.... do you need the enduser gas or do you want me to cut the enduser gas? If you really need the enduser gas... the only other option is for me... is to beg TCO to let me inject some pool gas into storage for that gas day to avoid the $10 withdrawal penalty... but we would still incur the overrun charge plus the additional overrun charge to get the gas into storage. Need a decision by 1 pm CST time on Monday, January 31st. Thank you!!!! Please pass this note to Melissa... still don't have her e-mail address. Can't wait for it to warm up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Embedded image moved to file: From: Joan Veselack pic00041.pcx) 01/27/2000 07:38 PM To: hboyd@columbiaenergygroup.com, kdestep@columbiaenergygroup.com cc: mstiles@columbiaenergygroup.com, knovsek@columbiaenergygroup.com, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Hendrickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: TCO STOW Overage - 1/24 Kara/Heidi, please give this to Brian and Melissa. Because the burns significantly increased on 1/24 from the forecasted amount (+16749). Contract #63281 was over-run and Storage #51407 was over-withdrawn. Contract over-run is $.21 per dkt and storage over-withdrawls are $10 per dkt. Because the forecast was lower, I let Joann use the extra space for CES Enduser Market. TCO will let me cut gas to CES Enduser Markets as a retro. Not sure if you want this gas to flow or try to make it up over the weekend. If you need the gas to flow because of OFO penalties, maybe the storage over-withdrawal is cheaper than incurring OFO penalties. Please tell me what you want me to do. Need to do the retro's ASAP while TCO is still feeling generous. FYI, the traders at Enron talked to Noel Bartlo on Tuesday. Noel said any costs over the space that retail had (134,710 for choice), Enron had the right to pass on the costs. I really hope the Noel communicated that to CES Retail. I would hate to have a huge misunderstanding between Enron and CES Retail. Remember, we schedulers are caught in the middle... and don't try to cause unnecessary pain. 63281/236 coh 7-1 2934/2872 63281/170 coh 7-5 1922/1881 63281/99 coh 5-2 427/418 63281/221 cpa8-35 1639/1604 63281/220 cpa8-35 511/500 Total 7433/7275 - pic00041.pcx
|