Iroquois Gas

Any concerns to forward to Becky Cantrell by Friday the 11th of Aug.???? We
currently only have a 2017 dkt/d term contract #125005, a 35,465 dkt/d term
contract #125008, an IT contract and a parking and loaning contract to handle
our Canadian term supply. We typically transport to markets off Iroquois, to
Tennnessee pipeline and CNG pipeline. That is a simplified summary of our
daily activity on Iroquois. If you need any information, please let me
know.
---------------------- Forwarded by Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT on 08/10/2000
08:37 AM ---------------------------

Enron North America Corp.

From: Rebecca W Cantrell 08/09/2000 07:39 PM

To: John Hodge/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor
Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Iroquois Gas

As noted in the Order 637 summary you received a couple of weeks ago,
Iroquois Gas is proposing to limit overlapping nominations on segmented
capacity. Shippers will only be able to overlap segments to the extent the
overlapped segment is within the path of both the releasing and replacement
shipper. Iroquois has made a number of arguments (some persuasive, some not)
about why any other procedure is operationally infeasible. For instance,
they state that they would have to eliminate umbrella accounts because the
process of reviewing contracts for interrelated releases would be too lengthy
to complete within GISB timelines.

Is this issue of major concern to any of you in transacting daily business on
Iroquois' system? Have we tried to do any segmenting outside of the paths?

Please give me a call at X.35840 by Friday morning if we should file comments
on this issue. I did not see anything else of significance in their filing.

Thanks.