Re: CES and CEM

Please see below-----better late response than never!!
---------------------- Forwarded by Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT on 01/02/2001
08:43 AM ---------------------------

Jeffrey T Hodge
12/21/2000 05:31 PM
To: Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: CES and CEM

Colleen:

This seems fine to me as well.

Jeff

Colleen Sullivan
12/15/2000 12:12 PM

To: Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: CES and CEM

Please see the two memos below. What is your take on these agency
relationships? It seems to me that it would be o.k. to do what Jeff Porter
is suggesting, just leaving them in CES' name until they can be transferred
to NPC...Maybe I'm missing something??

---------------------- Forwarded by Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT on 12/15/2000
12:10 PM ---------------------------

12/12/2000 01:46 PM
Jeffrey Porter@EES
Jeffrey Porter@EES
Jeffrey Porter@EES
12/12/2000 01:46 PM
12/12/2000 01:46 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Timothy L Ray/HOU/EES@EES, Michael H
Garred/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON@ECT
Subject: Re: CES and CEM

CES and CEM will still exist for awhile, maybe forever due to legal issues. I
wouldn't begin canceling anything as the Choice customers are still in CES's
name and we don't want any capacity returning or other problems. They should
begin to be transferred to NPC soon. Why don't you hold off for now. Larry
Friedeman (419/878-4760) is actually the last CES employee and can be reached
in his Toledo office through 3/31/01.

Chris Germany@ECT
12/12/2000 01:32 PM
To: Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Timothy L Ray/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Michael H Garred/HOU/EES@EES, Jeffrey Porter/HOU/EES@EES, Scott
Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: CES and CEM

I believe ENA is still agent for Columbia Energy Services and Columbia Energy
Marketing on several pipelines. Rich Contos's (the only CES person I know)
last day is this Friday. I left Rich a voicemail asking him if CES/CEM
should continue to exist as a legal entity on the pipelines.

As ENA, I believe I sould at least begin terminating the agency (and
liability) relationships.

Comments/questions??