Enron Mail

From:colleen.sullivan@enron.com
To:scott.mills@enron.com, martha.stevens@enron.com, thomas.engel@enron.com
Subject:Transport Capacity Ticket Question
Cc:scott.neal@enron.com, hunter.shively@enron.com, phillip.allen@enron.com,theresa.branney@enron.com, dan.junek@enron.com, maria.garza@enron.com, chris.germany@enron.com, judy.townsend@enron.com, bhavna.pandya@enron.com, chris.gaskill@enron.com, jeffre
Bcc:scott.neal@enron.com, hunter.shively@enron.com, phillip.allen@enron.com,theresa.branney@enron.com, dan.junek@enron.com, maria.garza@enron.com, chris.germany@enron.com, judy.townsend@enron.com, bhavna.pandya@enron.com, chris.gaskill@enron.com, jeffre
Date:Fri, 14 Apr 2000 04:04:00 -0700 (PDT)

I was wondering if this would work:

Problem: Third party demand reimbursements for transport are kept on
spreadsheets. I would like to automate this process.

Solution: Is it possible to enter a capacity ticket with a counterparty
(like ConEd), not a pipeline, and show a negative amount (or the opposite of
what we enter in when we are paying out a charge) therefore resulting in a
credit to the desk for that amount? Would the system accept such an entry
and would this generate the proper documentation for accounting?

For example, if the East Desk has a deal where ConEd releases capacity to ENA
at max rate, but then reimburses ENA for the demand charge (ENA pays the
commodity costs), the tickets would be entered as follows:
1) a transportation capacity ticket showing demand charges of $.10,
Counterparty = Transco - ENA will pay $$$ to the pipeline
2) a transportation capacity ticket showing demand charge of -.10,
Counterparty = Con Ed - ENA will receive $$$ from ConEd

It seems like this should work and would eliminate one more manual piece of
this transport p&l.
Please advise.