|
|
Enron Mail |
Cc: stevieg94@hotmail.com
Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: stevieg94@hotmail.com X-From: Steve Gillespie X-To: Beverly Beaty, mark.breese@enron.com @ ECT, Joann Collins, chris.germany@enron.com, Scott Hendrickson, Dick Jenkins, Victor Lamadrid, Robert Superty X-cc: stevieg94@hotmail.com @ ENRON X-bcc: X-Folder: \Chris_Germany_Dec2000\Notes Folders\Notes inbox X-Origin: Germany-C X-FileName: cgerman.nsf High Level Penalty Summary Date(s) of Flow November 18 - 21, 2000 Contract Involved: 38088 ENA delivered 33,250 to Hopewell on this contract for dates below. VNG needed volume below to balance at gate, attempted to pull and contract was overrun. 18 VNG took 29,782 from storage, result of both ENA and VNG was 14,002 overrun. 19 VNG took 44,476 from storage, result of both ENA and VNG was 28,696 overrun. 20 VNG took 37,643 from storage, result of both ENA and VNG was 21,863 overrun. 21 VNG took 56,881 from storage, result of both ENA and VNG was 18,876 overrun ______ Total Overrun: 83,437 @ $0.1992 = $16,620.65 60536 ENA delivered 11,451 back into the VNG storage as payback when VNG pulled all 14,625 and overran the contract. 21 14,306 overrun ______ Total Overrun: 14,306 @ $0.1992 = $2,849.76 TFE Total Firm Entitlement Penalty 18-21 97,743 @ $5.6684 = $554,050.00 Total Overrun on both contracts and penalty due to market area restrictions when overrun occurred. ****************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************** **************** 1) Enron NA was never notified by TCO of any penalty, overrun on VNG contract or pipeline OFO situation during the November 18-21 time period. 2) Denise Dotson was notified by VNG gas control on the morning of November 20th about the overrun situation above. The VNG gas control experienced the problem but did not notify Enron or AGL until Monday morning. 3) Enron immediately placed ranking system in Navigator to make VNG first priority. This was completed Monday afternoon November 20th. 4) On Tuesday morning 11/21, Denise Dotson once again called Enron stating that the previous night VNG attempted to pull maximum volumes from storage contracts only to overrun contract due to ENA nominations to other delivery points. Joann Collins called her Columbia team and was told that the ranking was not applicable after the last confirmation cycle on any gas day with no-notice contracts. Ranking has zero effect with the late night schedulers. 5) Enron dropped the Hopewell nomination from the VNG contract(s) effective 11/22. ---------------------- Forwarded by Steve Gillespie/Corp/Enron on 12/11/2000 01:05 PM --------------------------- "Denise Dotson" <ddotson@aglresources.com< on 12/08/2000 04:18:42 PM To: <robert.superty@enron.com<, <steve.gillespie@enron.com< cc: <ahamilto@aglresources.com<, <mark.breese@enron.com< Subject: Columbia Gas Transmission (TCO) penalties - November 2000 ** High Priority ** I received a call this afternoon from the VNG - TCO Account Manager. VNG incurred pipeline overrun charges from Nov 17th - 21st. TCO stated ENA used VNG capacity to deliver to other markets {Hopewell Power Plant}. TCO notified Enron and VNG of the allocation problem during the month of November, 2000. Although TCO assured Enron that the predetermined allocation methodology would be corrected to allow VNG rights to pull under the contract first, however, based on the conversation with TCO, corrections were not made. Therefore, VNG incurred overrun charges under the VNG contract @ $10.00/dth totaling $560,000+. Please notify pipeline to reconcile and provide AGLES with pipeline invoices for November, 2000. ENA is responsible for all penalties associated with this transaction.
|