Enron Mail

From:victor.lamadrid@enron.com
To:katherine.kelly@enron.com, scott.goodell@enron.com
Subject:Re: New Power Company on Transco
Cc:donna.greif@enron.com, clarissa.garcia@enron.com, robert.allwein@enron.com,beverly.beaty@enron.com, sherry.anastas@enron.com, tracy.wood@enron.com, chris.germany@enron.com
Bcc:donna.greif@enron.com, clarissa.garcia@enron.com, robert.allwein@enron.com,beverly.beaty@enron.com, sherry.anastas@enron.com, tracy.wood@enron.com, chris.germany@enron.com
Date:Tue, 14 Nov 2000 05:52:00 -0800 (PST)

Kathy/Scott,

I don't know exactly what Chris wanted but here's my stab at it and remember
my limited mental abilities are making a bunch of assumptions.....

Deal 459233 is the exchange offset to 459214 and should probably be zerod
out. 459193 is the exchange offset to 459175 and should probably be zerod
out as well.

Scott, 459188 and 459231 seem to be the New Power buys needed. I don't know
which are the New Power sales needed to hook up with transport to capture
transportation costs. Please verify...Maybe they are 377254 or 377264 or
377268 or 454060.....

460591 is the exchange offset to Oglethorpe deal 460623. They are totally
different and legite and outside of this discussion.

I hope this helps. Let's meet and make appropriate changes quickly so
Transco folks will have plenty of time to get changes in Unify for the month.

Thanks






From: Katherine L Kelly 11/10/2000 05:06 PM


To: Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Donna Greif/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clarissa Garcia/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beverly Beaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sherry Anastas/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: New Power Company on Transco

Hello!

Can we try to get together sometime Tuesday afternoon to discuss the New
Power Company on Transco? Chris Germany mentioned to me this afternoon that
there was a New Power Company deal starting with November production on
Transco and that it was similar to the one on Columbia Gas in that the sale
occurs at the storage facility. So, I decided to take a look and I can't
swear to everything, but I believe we may need to make a few changes. Deals
459214 and 459175 appear to be beginning balances that have been entered as
exchanges. I believe that these need to be killed. As far as I know, I
don't believe that there is any reason for logistics to need for a beginning
balance to come into unify. Beginning balances are entered into unify
manually by my group through a special screen. We just need to know what
that balance is before the December accounting month is closed so that we can
upload it.

Next, could you please get back to me with what the exchange deals of 459193
and 460623 are? I'm not quite sure what these exchanges were trying to
accomplish.

What I was thinking that I would see is something similar to how we have this
on Columbia Gas. Perhaps Robert can help us on this. I believe that is a
transport contract moving to a title transfer (external pool), then a storage
injection on the storage contract into the storage imbalance account, then
using the point functionality to show a buy/sell at storage to the New Power
Company.

Anyway, let me know when you are available. If we need to make adjustments,
it would be best to get this done soon.

Thanks!

Kathy