Enron Mail

From:michael.garred@enron.com
To:chris.germany@enron.com
Subject:Re: New Capacity for Nov-Oct
Cc:jeffrey.porter@enron.com
Bcc:jeffrey.porter@enron.com
Date:Thu, 19 Oct 2000 06:49:00 -0700 (PDT)

Everything looks fine with one exception. The contract at the bottom (K#
61825) should have already been in ENA's name starting Nov-00 through
Oct-2001. PLEASE CONFIRM THIS .

mhg
x35488





Michael H Garred
10/19/2000 01:38 PM
To: Jeffrey Porter/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: New Capacity for Nov-Oct

Jeff, can you verify the mdq's in yellow below? Do we have to take the Gulf
capacity per the LDC?

CHRIS --< JEFF HAS IS NOW ON THE NETWORK. HE CANNOT NOT RECIEVE EMAILS SENT
TO HIS OLD ADDRESS.


---------------------- Forwarded by Michael H Garred/HOU/EES on 10/19/2000
01:17 PM ---------------------------


Chris Germany@ECT
10/19/2000 12:47 PM
To: Michael H Garred/HOU/EES@EES, jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com
cc:
Subject: New Capacity for Nov-Oct

Call me when you get a chance. There is some new capacity to execute for
November. Expiring contracts are show in purple, the new contracts are shown
in yellow. Ignore the demand charges for now, I did not verify them. I
won't execute these until I hear from you.











The capacity listed below was purchased from the pipeline. Scott said Jeff
gave us the OK on this one.