|
|
Enron Mail |
I meant the top 4 contracts
--------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 10/19/2000 03:25 PM --------------------------- Chris Germany 10/19/2000 03:23 PM To: Michael H Garred/HOU/EES@EES cc: Jeffrey Porter/HOU/EES@EES Subject: Re: New Capacity for Nov-Oct You are correct. The top 3 contracts were released to CES and the bottom one is released to ENA. I will execute all of them and re-release the CES's contracts to ENA. Michael H Garred@EES 10/19/2000 01:49 PM To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Jeffrey Porter/HOU/EES@EES Subject: Re: New Capacity for Nov-Oct Everything looks fine with one exception. The contract at the bottom (K# 61825) should have already been in ENA's name starting Nov-00 through Oct-2001. PLEASE CONFIRM THIS . mhg x35488 Michael H Garred 10/19/2000 01:38 PM To: Jeffrey Porter/HOU/EES@EES cc: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: New Capacity for Nov-Oct Jeff, can you verify the mdq's in yellow below? Do we have to take the Gulf capacity per the LDC? CHRIS --< JEFF HAS IS NOW ON THE NETWORK. HE CANNOT NOT RECIEVE EMAILS SENT TO HIS OLD ADDRESS. ---------------------- Forwarded by Michael H Garred/HOU/EES on 10/19/2000 01:17 PM --------------------------- Chris Germany@ECT 10/19/2000 12:47 PM To: Michael H Garred/HOU/EES@EES, jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com cc: Subject: New Capacity for Nov-Oct Call me when you get a chance. There is some new capacity to execute for November. Expiring contracts are show in purple, the new contracts are shown in yellow. Ignore the demand charges for now, I did not verify them. I won't execute these until I hear from you. The capacity listed below was purchased from the pipeline. Scott said Jeff gave us the OK on this one.
|