Re: TRANSCO PROPRIETARY FILE

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 12/31/99 01:18
PM ---------------------------
From: Dave Nommensen on 12/30/99 04:29 PM
To: Beverly Beaty/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Gary L Payne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anita K
Patton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane E Niestrath/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: TRANSCO PROPRIETARY FILE

I think we can change the ranks pretty easily. As far as the business party
Ids go, I think we need to have you, Diane and the Transco rep (Bharati?)
discuss what needs to come across in the proprietary file. Transco was
making some changes on their side for the BUG stuff that we may not be taking
advantage of. We will see how the CES stuff fits in there as well.

Thanks, d.n.

From: Beverly Beaty 12/30/99 01:48 PM

To: Dave Nommensen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Gary L Payne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anita K
Patton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: TRANSCO PROPRIETARY FILE

Dave,

As we discussed over the telephone, we will have a problem with the CES
contracts as well
as the one we have with Brooklyn Union. Our proprietary file contacts the
business party id, rather
than the DUNS number. Currently, all of our activities default to Enron's
business party id. These
are the valid business parties we use:

ENA 5304
Brooklyn Union 21995
Columbia Energy Services 5092
Columbia Energy Marketing 7772

As we become agents for other parties, which CES is agent for various
producers, we will
need to include their business parties as well. For now, this is all we
need. In the meantime,
should I code the activities CES has already nominated that I will insert
into Unify as do not
send??

Also, another continuing problem is the 899 default ranking. We spend a
great deal of time
overriding this rank to 850 as a default and use 899 as the swing activity to
be cut as we need
it. Is there a way to default to 850 so we only have to change the one swing
activity to 899??

Thanks for you help.

Beverly
3-6357