Enron Mail

From:chris.germany@enron.com
To:s..olinger@enron.com
Subject:RE: Sitara deal 422054
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Mon, 25 Feb 2002 12:32:55 -0800 (PST)

I know. I'm gong to recommend zeroing out the deal in sitara under "expected volumes".

-----Original Message-----
From: Olinger, Kimberly S.
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 2:23 PM
To: Germany, Chris
Subject: RE: Sitara deal 422054

chris - if you zero expected volume out in sitara - it will zero deal out in unify.. In the past , this has been done by risk

-----Original Message-----
From: Germany, Chris
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 11:28 AM
To: Olinger, Kimberly S.; Fowler, Kulvinder
Subject: FW: Sitara deal 422054

I just showed Ed McMichael the sitara position screens for the East and Central Desk for March 1st. There are volumes all over the place. I asked him who should be taking these volumes to 0 since most of these deals are not physically flowing. Ed is going to discuss this in a meeting with Bob Hall today.

I guess my next question is should the volume be taken to 0 in Sitara or Unify.

Can you guys think of any other questions along those lines?

-----Original Message-----
From: Fowler, Kulvinder
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 10:37 AM
To: Germany, Chris
Subject: RE: Sitara deal 422054

I zeroed out the 33000/d for March - let me know if you hear anything about this deal.

Thanks

kf

-----Original Message-----
From: Germany, Chris
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 8:24 AM
To: Fowler, Kulvinder
Subject: Sitara deal 422054

I'm not sure if it should be terminated but to my knowledge we are not serving this deal so it probably should be terminated. I'm going to a "terminated contracts" meeting this morning so maybe I will find out more about how this works. I also don't see any volumes on this deal for March.