Enron Mail

From:colleen.sullivan@enron.com
To:scott.neal@enron.com, hunter.shively@enron.com, phillip.allen@enron.com
Subject:Transport P&L Report FYI
Cc:jeffrey.shankman@enron.com, judy.townsend@enron.com, dan.junek@enron.com,chris.germany@enron.com, theresa.branney@enron.com, kimberly.olinger@enron.com, jane.tholt@enron.com
Bcc:jeffrey.shankman@enron.com, judy.townsend@enron.com, dan.junek@enron.com,chris.germany@enron.com, theresa.branney@enron.com, kimberly.olinger@enron.com, jane.tholt@enron.com
Date:Wed, 31 May 2000 05:25:00 -0700 (PDT)

Just for your information--this may highlight the reason for the difficulty
for the East Region dividing its transportation usage tickets by contract
number. For the entire month of May, the Central region's transport p&l
report is 20 pages long (and that's after splitting up transport tickets by
contract number); the West report is 34 pages long; and the East + Market
East report is 90 pages long without splitting transport tickets by contract
number. If the East began breaking up usage tickets by contract number, it
could result in a five to seven fold increase in tickets.

Any thoughts ?