|
|
Enron Mail |
TO: Mark E. Haedicke
RE: Take TheLaw.net Challenge! FROM: Mark Whitney, CEO/President, TheLaw.net Corporation HOMEPAGE: http://www.thelaw.net REMOVE: http://www.thelaw.net/remove.htm If you are a savvy legal compusearcher you will not want to miss this opportunity to take the TheLaw.net Challenge, below. On the other hand, if you ever feel challenged when it comes to computer research, stay with us. We can help. Before you begin, forget that TheLaw.net's searchable cases overlap West and Lexis' to the tune of more than four million entries across more than 175 Federal and state appellate jurisdictions. Just put it out of your mind. Forget that it is very easy, using our software, to quickly learn for yourself how courts have treated the particular cite, statute, rule or regulation you are interested in learning more about. Forget that it is easy for you to quickly pop up cases when all you have is a cite, party name, author, counsel, court, and so forth. Forget that one of the major differences between TheLaw.net and The Two Headed Monster, is that everyone gets all of our highly usable, authoritative data with a national scope, all for a low flat rate. Finally, forget (if you can) that TheLaw.net delivers all of this and much, much more, on an unlimited use basis, directly to your desktop under the following terms and conditions: --$345 annually for you; regularly $395 (Save $50 until April 30) --$575 for you and a partner, annual unlimited use rate (Small Office Special) --$1195 for you and four others, annual unlimited use rate (Workgroup Edition) --April Enterprise Specials: ----$1895 for 10 annual, unlimited use rate (April Special) ----$3995 for 25 annual, unlimited use rate (April Special) ----$7995 for 50 annual unlimited use rate (April Special) --pay only for active users --paralegals, librarians and backoffice staff are on us --conduct real legal research with a seamless national scope --all subscribers install at work, at home and on their laptops --no passwords or user names --unlimited tech and reference attorney aftercare --no CDs to chase around the office --all you can eat - no surprises - no gamesmanship --30 day unconditional money back guarantee --to subscribe, go to our homepage and click "SIGN ME UP": http://www.thelaw.net We recognize that West and Lexis are King when it comes to enhancing public records and churning them in their searchable databases. But, for all of these highfalutin enhancements, one rarely hears the word value uttered in the same sentence with the names of either of these two companies. Which leads to some questions that you ought to be asking: Q: How much are all of these enhancements worth to you? Q: Are these enhancements timesaving or frustrating? Q: Does it make sense to continue with onerous annual contracts? Q: Can the list of expensive items be shortened with low, flat-rate options? Q: Rather than switching, should you simply redefine relationships with existing vendors in light of less expensive, authoritative options? Q: How can you ever expect to fully leverage publicly available web based documents and databases on behalf of the enterprise in the absence of a set of standards, processes and best practices for doing so? The answer to the last question is to have a one-stop front-end to that subset of the more than two billion pages online that belong a click or two away on your desktop. That's where we come in. Proprietary searchable case law aside, TheLaw.net, not West or Lexis, is King when it comes to getting you around online. --WEB BASED PRIMARY AUTHORITY JUST KEEPS GETTING BETTER There is no longer a debate about whether publicly available web based documents and databases will continue to loom large in the practice of law. That debate was completely foreclosed when West recently bought FindLaw for a reported $37M and Lexis poured a bunch of money into a portal called lexisONE. Both companies are now attempting to brand these free sites as the best place to begin when you want to find authoritative information on the public web. Are these web sites the best place for seasoned professionals to begin? As an attorney, you are, per se, a sophisticated consumer of information. Accordingly, we invite you to take TheLaw.net Challenge and decide for yourself. --HERE IS YOUR ASSIGNMENT SHOULD YOU CHOOSE TO ACCEPT IT Using lexisONE, find Chapter 60 (Tax) of the Consolidated Laws of New York. Do you have a stopwatch or timer ready? Good. By the way, lexisONE is located at: http://www.lexisone.com. Before starting, read on for a heads up on a couple of key factors relevant to your assignment. Starting at lexisONE should give you a big advantage. Why? Well, to begin with, this is Lexis we're talking about; the same company that just took out a full page ad in the current edition of Law Office Computing which claims, in relevant part, that if "you're a solo or small-firm attorney, the LexisONE service has everything you need to practice more effectively, run your office more efficiently, and keep up with the latest legal tools and trends." So are you ready? Are you excited? You should be, because you are about to discover just how effective and efficient you can be using lexisONE since, after all, they have "everything you need". Oh yes. One more datapoint before you begin. If you are lucky enough to eventually locate the link to the Consolidated Laws of New York that lexisONE provides, be forewarned that this link has been DYSFUNCTIONAL for at least the past two weeks. Why? Well, for one thing, the State of New York upgraded its massive web site on, or about, March 23, 2001. Since then, this portion of lexisONE's site has suffered from a nasty case of LINKROT. Translation: lexisONE is not current or complete as to some critical primary authority. At some point the people at lexisONE obviously determined that the Consolidated Laws of New York were indeed among the items needed to "practice more effectively". Today it is hard to know what they think. --WE PROMISED YOU A CHALLENGE Are you skilled enough to PRETEND that the link is working while trying to find it anyway? This way you can still get a feel for the effectiveness and efficiency you would have experienced using lexisONE had the link been working. Incidentally, if using lexisONE, you can find this link in less than two minutes, you are a God to us! Really. Now snap back to reality and consider that when you have a subscription to TheLaw.net you can view the specific page containing Chapter 60 of the Consolidated Laws in six or seven seconds by simply sliding through our smooth hierarchy of pre-configured Federal and State Statutes Menu. Once you locate the law you want to know more about, you can enter the statutory cite into our case law search engine, check New York from among the 175+ Federal and state appellate jurisdictions at your fingertips and quickly pop up a list of relevant cases that have construed the item you need to know more about. --THELAW.NET IS A BETTER MOUSETRAP. PERIOD. Free web site portals are fine for law students or an occasional reference when you are not under the gun. But, unless you have complete disregard for your time and your clients' best interests, if you are browsing the public web for purposes of serious research, you should have the right tool for the job. Only then will you be as "efficient" and "effective" as possible. The last thing you need is another ill-considered free web site. --REMEMBER THAT CASE LAW WE TOLD YOU TO FORGET? You can stop forgetting now and consider that subscribers to TheLaw.net Professional Legal Browser not only get all of that great case law with a national scope, but they receive slick, pre-configured menu-driven access to more than 50,000 web based documents and databases including Federal and state statutes, rules, forms, regulations, executive agency databases, legislative tracking tools, every major metropolitan newspaper, local rules and forms, pattern jury instructions, court calendars and contact information, expedited pathfinders to most Federal dockets, executive agency databases, columnists, real-time national news and wire services, corporate backgrounders, polls, searchable dictionaries, encyclopedias, calculators, selected law journals and law reviews, nearly 10,000 helpers arranged across dozens of practice areas, and much, much more. If lexisONE "has everything you need" how can it be that we have 30,000 more deep-links to web based documents and databases and 35,000 more than FindLaw? Hmmm. --THELAW.NET: THE SUM OF THE ALTERNATIVES Within one business day of New York upgrading their web site, subscribers to TheLaw.net were informed via a free special email alert that we had updated their software and that the new homepage for the Consolidated Laws is right here: http://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?cl=0 As of this writing (Sunday, April 8, 2001) LexisONE is still linked to the old outmoded location: http://assembly.state.ny.us/cgi-bin/claws Once this message gets passed around the Net someone at Lexis will see it and fix the broken link. We are happy to help out, because even when the New York Consolidated and Unconsolidated Law links are finally functional, LexisONE still merely provides the following: --one link to New York Consolidated Laws Homepage --one link to New York Unconsolidated Laws Homepage --one link to the New York Constitution Homepage --Cf. THELAW.NET PROFESSIONAL BROWSER: --Linking by Constitutional Article, we provide 22 hand-titled links to the New York Constitution. --Linking by Statutory Subject Matter we provide 96 hand-titled links to the New York Consolidated Laws, plus one link to the Consolidated Laws Homepage and one link to the Consolidated Laws Index for a total of 98 links. --Linking by Statutory Subject Matter we provide 25 hand-titled links to the New York Unconsolidated Laws, plus one link to the Unconsolidated Laws Homepage for a total of 26 links. --We provide an additional separate link to the search interface for these laws. --In total, TheLaw.net provides 147 hand-titled, deep-links just to this discrete subset of New York primary authority. --LexisONE provides three links and two of them are broken. TheLaw.net literally removes more than 90% of the time wasted online. If you begin with lexisONE or FindLaw, you need to add an additional layer of effort to get to specific statutory subject areas of the Consolidated Laws that we completely eliminate with our detailed deep-links. --ON THE OTHER HAND, LEXISONE MAY BE "GOOD ENOUGH" Surely, lexisONE must have some replicable process in place for maintaining their links. But if statutes from a major metropolitan state can disappear from the radar, what happens when you have a really important issue to research, such as: "Do Trendy Clothes Catch Trendy Clients?" We are not lying. See for yourself. (This link works.) http://www.lexisone.com/lifestyle/style/040101b.html It could be that our standards are unreasonably high. Maybe we should take our lead from Lexis-Nexis Chief Technology Officer Allan McLaughlin who made the following lexisONE observation in the recent article "Lexis-Nexis and West Battle Online", published by The American Lawyer and law.com: "It's not our best product," confides McLaughlin, "but for a lot of lawyers, it's good enough.'" Good enough? Hopefully you are not one of the THOSE lawyers. Given the inclusion, in our tool, of searchable proprietary case law, we have tried to clarify some of the differences between a marginally maintained free directory and a true best practices software solution. We thank you for taking TheLaw.net Challenge. --YOU ARE NOW CORDIALLY INVITED TO VISIT OUR WEB SITE Homepage: http://www.thelaw.net Check our TOP 25 FAQs: http://www.thelaw.net/faqs.htm Check our References: http://www.thelaw.net/references.htm View Sample Tutorials: http://www.thelaw.net/searchdemo/home.htm Our prices are always at: http://www.thelaw.net/subscribe.htm Sign up online at: http://www.thelaw.net/fulfillment.htm Call toll free with any questions and we'll book a subscription for you: 1.877.4.LAWNET [877.452.9638] --CONSIDER OUR VISION: A FIRM FOUNDATION AT A LOW FLAT-RATE TheLaw.net, privately held and successful from Day One, represents the next logical step; a big improvement over slogging through two billion web pages and otherwise watching legal research costs spiral out of control at a time when with normal free market principles at work, such costs would be plummeting. Imagine. No surprises. No meters. No printing, downloading, pay-per-view or on-demand fees. In short, none of the gamesmanship you have come to expect and never appreciated. At your option, we can build your packages and deliver them today via our web site or we can ship CDs via U.S. Priority Mail or FedEx. We thank you for your time and we hope to hear from you soon while the April savings last! Regards, MARK WHITNEY CEO/President, TheLaw.net Corporation Chicago - San Diego, USA Toll Free: 1.877.4.LAWNET (1.877.452.9638) ****************************************** CASES INCLUDED IN THE DATABASE AND YEAR OF ORIGIN -----Sorted in Order of Federal Circuit ---------See also, http://www.thelaw.net/compare.htm --United States Supreme Court 1900 --Federal Circuit 1982 --U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit 1950 FIRST FEDERAL CIRCUIT --U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit 1930 --Maine Supreme Judicial Court 1996 --Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court 1930 --Massachusetts Appeals Court 1930 --New Hampshire Supreme Court 1930 --Rhode Island Supreme Court 1950 SECOND FEDERAL CIRCUIT --U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit 1930 --Connecticut Supreme Court 1950 --Connecticut Appellate Court 1950 --New York Court of Appeals 1955 --New York Supreme Court, Appellate Div. 1st Dept. 1955 --New York Supreme Court, Appellate Div. 2nd Dept. 1955 --New York Supreme Court, Appellate Div. 3rd Dept. 1955 --New York Supreme Court, Appellate Div. 4th Dept. 1955 --New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term 1st Dept. 1955 --New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term 2nd Dept. 1955 --Vermont Supreme Court 1930 THIRD FEDERAL CIRCUIT --U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit 1930 --U.S. District Court, New Jersey 1999 --New Jersey Supreme Court 1930 --New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division 1930 --U.S. District Court, Eastern, Pennsylvania 1997 --Pennsylvania Supreme Court 1950 --Pennsylvania Superior Court 1950 --Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court 1950 FOURTH FEDERAL CIRCUIT --U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit 1930 --U.S. District Court, Maryland 1999 --Maryland Court of Appeals 1950 --Maryland Special Court of Appeals 1950 --North Carolina Supreme Court 1945 --North Carolina Court of Appeals 1968 --U.S. District Court, South Carolina 1999 --South Carolina Supreme Court 1996 --South Carolina Court of Appeals 1996 --Virginia Supreme Court 1930 --Virginia Court of Appeals 1930 --West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals 1991 FIFTH FEDERAL CIRCUIT --U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit 1930 --Louisiana Supreme Court 1980 --Louisiana Court of Appeals, 1st Circuit 1980 --Louisiana Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit 1980 --Louisiana Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit 1980 --Louisiana Court of Appeals, 4th Circuit 1980 --Louisiana Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit 1980 --U.S. District Court, Northern, Mississippi 1997 --Mississippi Supreme Court 1994 --Mississippi Court of Appeals 1994 --Texas Supreme Court 1950 --Texas Court of Criminal Appeals 1950 --Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District 1950 --Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District 1950 --Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District 1950 --Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District 1950 --Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District 1950 --Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District 1950 --Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District 1950 --Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District 1950 --Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District 1950 --Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District 1950 SIXTH FEDERAL CIRCUIT --U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit 1930 --Kentucky Supreme Court 1945 --Kentucky Court of Appeals 1945 --Michigan Supreme Court 1930 --Michigan Court of Appeals 1965 --Ohio Supreme Court 1950 --Ohio Court of Appeals, 1st District 1950 --Ohio Court of Appeals, 2nd District 1950 --Ohio Court of Appeals, 3rd District 1950 --Ohio Court of Appeals, 4th District 1950 --Ohio Court of Appeals, 5th District 1950 --Ohio Court of Appeals, 6th District 1950 --Ohio Court of Appeals, 7th District 1950 --Ohio Court of Appeals, 8th District 1950 --Ohio Court of Appeals, 9th District 1950 --Ohio Court of Appeals, 10th District 1950 --Ohio Court of Appeals, 11th District 1950 --Ohio Court of Appeals, 12th District 1950 --Tennessee Supreme Court 1950 --Tennessee Court of Appeals, Middle Grand Division 1950 --Tennessee Court of Appeals, Eastern Grand Division 1950 --Tennessee Court of Appeals, Western Grand Division 1950 --Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals, Middle Grand Division 1950 --Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals, Eastern Grand Division 1950 --Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals, Western Grand Division 1950 SEVENTH FEDERAL CIRCUIT --U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit 1930 --Illinois Supreme Court 1985 --Illinois Appellate Court, 1st District 1985 --Illinois Appellate Court, 2nd District 1985 --Illinois Appellate Court, 3rd District 1985 --Illinois Appellate Court, 4th District 1985 --Illinois Appellate Court, 5th District 1985 --Indiana Supreme Court 1940 --Indiana Court of Appeals, 1st District 1940 --Indiana Court of Appeals, 2nd District 1940 --Indiana Court of Appeals, 3rd District 1940 --Indiana Court of Appeals, 4th District 1940 --Indiana Court of Appeals, 5th District 1940 --Indiana Tax Court 1986 --Wisconsin Supreme Court 1945 --Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District I 1945 --Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District II 1945 --Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District III 1945 --Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District IV 1945 EIGHTH FEDERAL CIRCUIT --U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit 1930 --Arkansas Supreme Court 1957 --Arkansas Court of Appeals 1957 --Iowa Supreme Court 1995 --Iowa Court of Appeals 1995 --Minnesota Supreme Court 1930 --Minnesota Court of Appeals 1983 --Missouri Supreme Court 1960 --Missouri Court of Appeals 1960 --Nebraska Supreme Court 1965 --Nebraska Court of Appeals 1965 --U.S. District Court, North Dakota 1999 --North Dakota Supreme Court 1930 --North Dakota Court of Appeals 1930 --South Dakota Supreme Court 1965 NINTH FEDERAL CIRCUIT --U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit 1941 --Alaska Supreme Court 1960 --Alaska Court of Appeals 1960 --Arizona Supreme Court 1930 --Arizona Court of Appeals, 1st Division 1930 --Arizona Court of Appeals, 2nd Division 1930 --U.S. District Court, Central, California 1998 --California Supreme Court 1930 --California Court of Appeal, 1st Appellate District 1930 --California Court of Appeal, 2nd Appellate District 1930 --California Court of Appeal, 3rd Appellate District 1930 --California Court of Appeal, 4th Appellate District 1930 --California Court of Appeal, 5th Appellate District 1930 --California Court of Appeal, 6th Appellate District 1930 --Hawaii Supreme Court 1930 --Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals 1930 --Idaho Supreme Court 1965 --Idaho Court of Appeals 1965 --Montana Supreme Court 1993 --Nevada Supreme Court 1950 --Oregon Supreme Court 1950 --Oregon Court of Appeals 1950 --Washington Supreme Court 1935 --Washington Court of Appeals, 1st Division 1969 --Washington Court of Appeals, 2nd Division 1969 --Washington Court of Appeals, 3rd Division 1969 TENTH FEDERAL CIRCUIT --U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit 1930 --Tenth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel --Colorado Supreme Court 1930 --Colorado Court of Appeals 1930 --Kansas Supreme Court 1982 --Kansas Court of Appeals 1982 --New Mexico Supreme Court 1930 --New Mexico Court of Appeals 1930 --Oklahoma Supreme Court 1994 --Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals 1994 --Oklahoma Court of Appeals 1994 --Utah Supreme Court 1950 --Utah Court of Appeals 1950 --Wyoming Supreme Court 1993 ELEVENTH FEDERAL CIRCUIT --U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit 1981 --Alabama Supreme Court 1955 --Alabama Court of Civil Appeals 1955 --Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals 1955 --Florida Supreme Court 1950 --Florida District Court of Appeal, 1st District 1950 --Florida District Court of Appeal, 2nd District 1950 --Florida District Court of Appeal, 3rd District 1950 --Florida District Court of Appeal, 4th District 1950 --Florida District Court of Appeal, 5th District 1950 --Georgia Supreme Court 1940 --Georgia Court of Appeals 1940 **************************************************************** PRIVACY STATEMENT: TheLaw.net respects your time and we believe this is the fastest, least intrusive method of originating contact with busy professionals. But we also provide several mechanisms allowing recipients to remove themselves easily and at no cost. Simply go to: http://www.thelaw.net/remove.htm OR reply to: remove@thelaw.net and enter the email address that you would like removed in the subject line OR call toll free 1.877.452.9638. See also: http://www.thelaw.net and click "Privacy Statement". ***************************************************************** FindLaw is a registered trademark of West Group. Lexis, Lexis-Nexis and lexisONE are registered trademarks of LEXIS-NEXIS, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc.
|