|
|
Enron Mail |
It's ok with me. Mark
"JOHN G KLAUBERG" <JKLAUBER@LLGM.COM< 02/19/2001 01:35 PM To: Mark.E.Haedicke@enron.com cc: Subject: Re: Fwd: Enron Mark: As noted in the few attached e-mails, we have been asked to give some general advice on municipalization to the City of Bakersfield, CA. I assume that this is not an issue from a conflcit perspective, but because it "touches" CA I had raised it with Vicki just in case there was something that i was not aware of . Could I bother you to Reply to this and just let me know if you see any possible problem with us doing this work? Thanks. It was good to catch up with you briefly on Friday. It sure seems like everything is going very well for you. With everything you have going on, both domestically and internationally, I appreciate your taking the time to get together. I'm sure we will be speaking in the not too distant future as the CA developments continue to unfold over the next few weeks. Thanks. John "This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is confidential and it may be protected by the attorney/client or other privileges. This e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public information intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient, please delete this e-mail, including attachments and notify me by return mail, e-mail or by phone at 212 424-8125. The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of the e-mail, including attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful. John Klauberg LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P. 212 424-8125 jklauber@llgm.com ----- Message from vsharp@enron.com on Mon, 19 Feb 2001 12:42:00 -0600 ----- To: JKLAUBER@LLGM.COM Subject: Re: Fwd: Enron I am ok with this. Since this a muni, do you think you should check with Mark as well? "JOHN G KLAUBERG" <JKLAUBER@LLGM.COM< on 02/16/2001 09:36:54 AM To: vsharp@enron.com cc: Subject: Fwd: Enron Vicki: I assume this is not a problem from a conflict, but just wanted to double check since it "touches" CA. As you may know from the trade press, a number of cities, etc. have been looking into the possibility of forming their own muncipallly owned utilities in light of all the CA problems. This will undoubtedly be a long and arduous process by any city that pursues it and probably will not go anywhere, at least not in the short term. Nonetheless, I just wanted to check. I assume we are still on for this afternoon at 2:00 p.m. Thanks. John "This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is confidential and it may be protected by the attorney/client or other privileges. This e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public information intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient, please delete this e-mail, including attachments and notify me by return mail, e-mail or by phone at 212 424-8125. The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of the e-mail, including attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful. John Klauberg LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P. 212 424-8125 jklauber@llgm.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 19:42:16 -0500 From: "DEAN HANSELL" <DHANSELL@LLGM.COM< To: "JOHN G KLAUBERG" <JKLAUBER@LLGM.COM< cc: "STEVEN H DAVIS" <SDAVIS@LLGM.COM< Subject: Enron MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline John, As mentioned in my E-mail, I have been contacted by the City Attorney of Bakersfield, Cal., a city of about 150,000 concerning our ability to advice the City concerning it operating its own electric utility. I told him that because of our work for Enron that I would need to check whether we would be in a position to be of assistance. I would appreciate your thoughts. Bakersfield is in P G & E's service area. Dean
|