|
|
Enron Mail |
We want the letter on Doyle and New Albany ASAP. Is there any reason we
would not do the joint defense agreement. Mark "Al Kimball" <akimball@bracepatt.com< 10/27/2000 02:08 PM To: <dan.lyons@enron.com<, <mark.e.haedicke@enron.com< cc: "W. Cleland Dade" <cdade@bracepatt.com< Subject: Fwd: Joint Defense Agreement Received this just now - will not reply until we have your thoughts. Cle Dade had a thought about mentioning the existing New Albany - Doyle units in our reply letter as well. We are available at your convenience to discuss the New Albany - Doyle turbine situation vis-a-vis Power Systems - Al ----- Message from "B. Trent Webb" <BWEBB@shb.com< on Fri, 27 Oct 2000 12:25:53 -0500 ----- To: akimball@bracepatt.com cc: tchurbuck@powermfg.com Subject: Joint Defense Agreement Al, Our non-infringement opinion letters on the redesigned components have been ready now for over one week. I understood your client was anxious to receive them, so we worked very hard to complete them as quickly as we could. Please forward to me the executed Joint Defense Agreement so that I can forward our non-infringement letters. Let me know if you have any questions. Trent "WorldSecure Server <shb.com<" made the following annotations on 10/27/00 12:24:50 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ From the law offices of Shook,Hardy, Bacon LLP. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message including attachments, if any, is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. If you are the intended recipient but do not wish to receive communications through this medium, please so advise the sender immediately. =============================================================================
|