|
|
Enron Mail |
Thanks for the up-date. I think it is very good for Enron to be seen as a
leader in these dicussions. Particularly, I beleive that this process takes much of the steam out of any attempt by the Bureau to portrait Enron as someone who is not prepared to play within the rules. As well, Enron is building credibility with the Regulators in Alberta which in my view may serve us quite well down the road on Prject Stanley. I plan to keep Glenn Leslie and Web MacDonald in the loop because I really think the two processes are linked. Regards Dan. ----- Original Message ----- From: <Robert.Hemstock@enron.com< To: <Rob.Milnthorp@enron.com<; <Derek.Davies@enron.com<; <John.Zufferli@enron.com<; <Peter.Keohane@enron.com<; <Tim.Belden@enron.com< Cc: <aleck.trawick@blakes.com<; <dpef@blakes.com<; <Aleck.Dadson@enron.com< Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2000 11:53 PM Subject: Update - Proposed Alberta Power Pool Rule Changes < The attached memo provides an update on the status of the Power Pool's < further consideration of the proposed rule changes. In summary, it appears < the Pool will not proceed with the proposal to exclude import offers from < setting pool price but will recommend a rule that reduces ability of < suppliers to become price takers on volumes that were originally priced too < high to clear the merit order. I will receive more specifics on the < dispatch risk rule change on Monday. < < Regards, < < Rob < < (See attached file: memoec~1.doc)
|