![]() |
Enron Mail |
Agree with these comments given that much of the regulatory oversight is now
with the FSA. I would also support the application. < -----Original Message----- < From: Jerry.delmissier@barclayscapital.com < [SMTP:Jerry.delmissier@barclayscapital.com] < Sent: 12 October 2001 11:46 < To: RPICKEL@isda.org; BOARD@isda.org < Cc: MCUNNINGHAM@isda.org; esebton@isda-eur.org; rmetcalfe@isda-eur.org < Subject: RE: Bank of England Application < < bob, < i am a supporter. in our dealings we see the bank as a growing user of < derivatives and feel comfortable with the separation from the FSA. the < new < role the bank plays is more akin to what some of the other central banks < in < europe do rather than the fed or boj. < < -----Original Message----- < From: Robert Pickel [mailto:RPICKEL@isda.org] < Sent: 12 October 2001 16:59 < To: ISDA BOARD < Cc: Mary Cunningham; Emmanuelle Sebton; Richard Metcalfe < Subject: Bank of England Application < < < Shortly before the teleconference Board meeting two weeks ago we received < an < application from the Bank of England for subscriber membership. When we < have < considered central banks or government agencies for membership in the < past, < consideration has focused on the nature of the applicant's derivatives < activities, its regulatory role and the type of information they are < likely < to obtain from ISDA. Because of their derivatives activities, we have < generally admitted these applicants (e.g., the Kingdoms of Belgium, < Denmark < and Sweden, the Reserve Banks of South Africa and New Zealand). We have < even < admitted the Bank for International Settlements as a member. In general, < we < let them know that they may not be able to receive the full range of ISDA < materials (e.g., draft comment letters or position papers) and that there < may be a need to exclude them from certain committees or discussions. < < In previous Board discussions, a higher degree of concern has been < expressed < if, theoretically, the Federal Reserve, the Bank of Japan, the Bank of < England or similarly influential central banks were to apply for < membership. < These central banks typically have a greater degree of involvement in the < regulatory debates (particularly on capital) and are better positioned to < influence the process. < < Since some of those previous debates, the regulatory role of the Bank of < England has diminished and the role of the Financial Services Authority < has < correspondingly increased. The Bank of England still plays the traditional < central bank roles of controller of the money supply, dealing in the < market < and lender of last resort, but the supervisory role has shifted to the < FSA. < < In light of these developments, but recognizing the concerns previously < expressed on central bank membership, I would appreciate your views on the < application of the Bank of England. We have also had overtures from the < Hong < Kong Monetary Authority regarding membership although we have not received < an application. < < Please share your views with the other members of the Board. < < Bob < < < ------------------------------------------------------------------------ < For more information about Barclays Capital, please < visit our web site at http://www.barcap.com. < < < Internet communications are not secure and therefore the Barclays < Group does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this < message. Although the Barclays Group operates anti-virus programmes, < it does not accept responsibility for any damage whatsoever that is < caused by viruses being passed. Any views or opinions presented are < solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the < Barclays Group. Replies to this email may be monitored by the Barclays < Group for operational or business reasons. < < ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|