Enron Mail

From:jerry.delmissier@barclayscapital.com
To:rpickel@isda.org, board@isda.org
Subject:RE: Bank of England Application
Cc:mcunningham@isda.org, esebton@isda-eur.org, rmetcalfe@isda-eur.org
Bcc:mcunningham@isda.org, esebton@isda-eur.org, rmetcalfe@isda-eur.org
Date:Fri, 12 Oct 2001 09:45:41 -0700 (PDT)

bob,
i am a supporter. in our dealings we see the bank as a growing user of
derivatives and feel comfortable with the separation from the FSA. the new
role the bank plays is more akin to what some of the other central banks in
europe do rather than the fed or boj.

-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Pickel [mailto:RPICKEL@isda.org]
Sent: 12 October 2001 16:59
To: ISDA BOARD
Cc: Mary Cunningham; Emmanuelle Sebton; Richard Metcalfe
Subject: Bank of England Application


Shortly before the teleconference Board meeting two weeks ago we received an
application from the Bank of England for subscriber membership. When we have
considered central banks or government agencies for membership in the past,
consideration has focused on the nature of the applicant's derivatives
activities, its regulatory role and the type of information they are likely
to obtain from ISDA. Because of their derivatives activities, we have
generally admitted these applicants (e.g., the Kingdoms of Belgium, Denmark
and Sweden, the Reserve Banks of South Africa and New Zealand). We have even
admitted the Bank for International Settlements as a member. In general, we
let them know that they may not be able to receive the full range of ISDA
materials (e.g., draft comment letters or position papers) and that there
may be a need to exclude them from certain committees or discussions.

In previous Board discussions, a higher degree of concern has been expressed
if, theoretically, the Federal Reserve, the Bank of Japan, the Bank of
England or similarly influential central banks were to apply for membership.
These central banks typically have a greater degree of involvement in the
regulatory debates (particularly on capital) and are better positioned to
influence the process.

Since some of those previous debates, the regulatory role of the Bank of
England has diminished and the role of the Financial Services Authority has
correspondingly increased. The Bank of England still plays the traditional
central bank roles of controller of the money supply, dealing in the market
and lender of last resort, but the supervisory role has shifted to the FSA.

In light of these developments, but recognizing the concerns previously
expressed on central bank membership, I would appreciate your views on the
application of the Bank of England. We have also had overtures from the Hong
Kong Monetary Authority regarding membership although we have not received
an application.

Please share your views with the other members of the Board.

Bob


------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information about Barclays Capital, please
visit our web site at http://www.barcap.com.


Internet communications are not secure and therefore the Barclays
Group does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this
message. Although the Barclays Group operates anti-virus programmes,
it does not accept responsibility for any damage whatsoever that is
caused by viruses being passed. Any views or opinions presented are
solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the
Barclays Group. Replies to this email may be monitored by the Barclays
Group for operational or business reasons.

------------------------------------------------------------------------