![]() |
Enron Mail |
This decision upholds the FERC order that EPMI (and other marketers) properly
terminated their prospective transactions with PCA during the summer of 1999 when PCA defaulted (EPMI was not required to give 60 days notice before termination). ---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 04/19/2001 09:55 AM --------------------------- "Dan Watkiss" <dwatkiss@bracepatt.com< on 04/19/2001 09:30:22 AM To: <rreilley@coral-energy.com<, <cnicola@enron.com<, <jhartso@enron.com< cc: Subject: Fwd: D.C. Circuit Opinion in 99-1263b, Power Co America vs. FERC (April 17, 2001) In the attached decision of the D.C. Cir., Power Company of America lost each of its various challenges to FERC's decision that the 60-day notice of termination regulation did not apply to the sales agreements with PCA that marketers unilaterally terminated in the summer of '99. Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 08:58:45 -0500 From: "Tracey Bradley" <tbradley@bracepatt.com< To: "Andrea Settanni" <asettanni@bracepatt.com<, "Charles Shoneman" <cshoneman@bracepatt.com<, "Dan Watkiss" <dwatkiss@bracepatt.com<, "Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com< Subject: D.C. Circuit Opinion in 99-1263b, Power Co America vs. FERC (April 17, 2001) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_E6BD0F9C.EC8DEB10" In case you haven't already seen the decision, it is attached. - 99-1263b.txt
|