|
|
Enron Mail |
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Mark E Haedicke X-To: rainslie@isda.org X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Mark_Haedicke_Oct2001\Notes Folders\Sent X-Origin: HAEDICKE-M X-FileName: mhaedic.nsf I have responded below. Also, my title is Managing Director and General Counsel of Enron Wholesale Markets. I would add a bullet " comparison of masters in use in North America." Mark ----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 09/19/2000 01:15 PM ----- Ruth Ainslie <RAinslie@isda.org< 09/19/2000 12:34 PM To: Mark Haedicke <Mark.E.Haedicke@enron.com< cc: Mary Cunningham <MCUNNINGHAM@isda.org<, Robert Pickel <RPICKEL@isda.org< Subject: North American Energy and Power Committee Meeting: invitation dr aft and questions Mark Bob, Mary and I have been discussing a variety of issues and need your input before sending out the invitation, which we should do soon. Please advise on the following: 1. We continue to feel the name of the committee (including Power) is not sufficiently expansive to accommodate the growing markets involving energy and other new derivatives. We were considering something like Energy and Developing Derivative Markets? We thought the old name Commodities had a traditional rather than a forward-looking sound to it. What are your thoughts? I like Energy/Emerging Markets Committee or Energy and Emerging Markets Committee. 2. As we discussed a couple of weeks ago, invites should go to US companies and non-US companies with a US presence in the energy/commodity markets. Non-members should be invited as in London. We told people at the London meeting about the Houston meeting so they are on notice. Also, if there are minutes of that meeting produced soon they will probably refer to the meeting so there may be no need to invite them. Individual call-ins should be discouraged, but we might consider giving people an opportunity to gather at ISDA NY and plug a small group in from there. It's unlikely we will get many people from NY to go to Houston just for this meeting. I am ok with plugging people in from NYC so long as we know exactly who we are plugging in. 3. When you suggested Enron as the venue, were you offering a conference room or should we be considering the Doubletree or somewhere else? . Did we ever settle hours, etc. and whether there should be some kind of "social event" afterwards and for whom? All of this is obviously intended to increase the profile/activity of the committee; highlight the upcoming conference; focus on the issues that are not as significant to the European committee. Should we agree to a general social event, we'll include in the attached draft invitation. I am ok having a social event, but wonder if we shouldn't see how this meeting goes and plan next time accordingly. Please schedule a room at the Doubletree. I would suggest 3:30 and plan on a two hours meeting. 4. Attached is a draft invitation. Please comment on the text, etc. Would you prefer to be the signatory? No <<Energy Agenda Draft.doc<< I look forward to your thoughts. Many thanks, Ruth - Energy Agenda Draft.doc
|