|
|
Enron Mail |
Why wouldn't we use the EEI form in Ontario? The markets will be integrated,
at least in part, into the US. We could have an annex for Ontario. We will be using the EEI form right across the border in the US. Let 's chat about this. Regards, Mark Peter Keohane 10/25/2000 08:58 AM To: Chris Gaffney/TOR/ECT@ECT cc: Greg Johnston/CAL/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: Power Master Chris, Greg is putting the finishing touches on the Power Master as well as a GTC. Greg, Chris needs the Master form ASAP so we can take the lead on this Ontario industry form development iniative. Can you finalize the form and prepare a bullet point memo as requested by Chris comparing the differences between our form and EEI. Greg, also you should coordinate a Calgary office meeting with traders and originators (not more than 1 hour) to unveil and explain the form ASAP. Alberta Market Opening and PPA trading commences Jan 1/01 and we may need push to get Masters signed or rely on GTC in the short term. Chris, you should do likewise in Toronto when appropriate. Milly, would it be a worthwhile expense for Greg to attend the firstOntario industry meeting in Toronto with Chris, as Greg has the background on developing the form? Mark and Elizabeth, FYI. Peter. From: Chris Gaffney 10/25/2000 08:01 AM To: Greg Johnston/CAL/ECT@ECT cc: Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Power Master Greg - Sorry to keep bothering you on the Power Master, but I was wondering what is the ETA for the form? The reason I ask is that I am going to be involved in the industry push here in Ontario to develop a standard physical bilateral agreement. While it is my understanding that many participants want to start with the EEI form and OPGI believes that they already have a next to final form, for obvious reasons Peter and Milly would like to see our form become the industry standard. Another thing that would be helpful is a brief memo describing the differences between the EEI form and our form and the rationale for the differences. Some of this may be readily apparent from running a blackline, but I would like to have the benefit of the knowledge you have built up in developing the form. Timing of this is fairly tight as the next meeting on this initiative is November 9th. My goal is to show up at the meeting and advocate a "Canadianized" version of the EEI form and then describe the great time and effort Enron has expended on this already and table our draft as a starting point. Apparently EEI will also be in attendance. I will follow up with Elizabeth Sager on what is the status of our relationship with EEI and what was the US experience in developing the EEI master. Regards CJG
|