|
|
Enron Mail |
No we don't typically intervene in CTS filings.
Alan Comnes 12/28/2000 11:48 AM To: mhain@enron.com cc: smara@enron.com=20 Subject: CAL PX filing I assume we do not want to intervene on this although if we do please note= =20 the filing date. CTS I believe is the block forwards portion of the PX. = =20 Also this is a compliance filing to an earlier FERC decision. GAC From Janet Butler's weekly summary: California Power Exchange Corporation, ER01-80-000 and ER01-81-000. Revised= =20 Tariff Sheets to Amendment to Participation Agreement. On October 10, in=20 Docket No. ER01-80-000, the California Power Exchange Corp. (CalPX), on=20 behalf of its CalPX Trading Services Division (CTS), filed Amendment No. 5 = to=20 streamline the Participation Agreement between CTS and its participants. CT= S=20 also proposed to clarify that default chargebacks will be billed as=20 administrative fees and proposes a few non-substantive editorial changes. = =20 Order issued November 21 accepting CTS=01, Amendment No. 5 as modified. Ord= er=20 rejects (1) the proposed change to the Assignment provision and directs a= =20 compliance filing removing it; and (2) the proposal to incorporate the=20 Information Guide and states to the extent that the Information Guide=20 contains terms and conditions significantly, affecting services or rates, C= TS=20 should file to incorporate into the CTS Rate Schedule those portions of the= =20 Information Guide that pertain to services and rates. On December 19, CalP= X=20 filed revised tariff sheets in compliance with the November 21 order. Fili= ng=20 noticed December 19. Protests due January 4.
|