Enron Mail

From:mary.hain@enron.com
To:jeff.dasovich@enron.com
Subject:Re: FERC Order and DWR
Cc:joe.hartsoe@enron.com, jklauber@llgm.com, susan.mara@enron.com,james.steffes@enron.com, christian.yoder@enron.com, alan.comnes@enron.com, tracy.ngo@enron.com
Bcc:joe.hartsoe@enron.com, jklauber@llgm.com, susan.mara@enron.com,james.steffes@enron.com, christian.yoder@enron.com, alan.comnes@enron.com, tracy.ngo@enron.com
Date:Mon, 12 Mar 2001 03:31:00 -0800 (PST)

In the Staff Recommendation on Prospective Market Monitoring and Mitigation,
March 2001, the FERC Staff stated that its proposed mitigation proposal is
designed to apply only to approximately 5% of the market that remains in
real-time and not to the bilateral and forward markets. In addition, the
December 15 order only established a reporting requirement for sales into the
ISO and PX spot markets exceeding $150/MWh. Under the order, the refund
potential closes after 60 days of a utility filing its cost justification
unless the FERC issues written notification to the seller that its
transaction is still under review. Note well that this does not entirely
insulate EPMI concerning long term deals because the FERC's December 15 order
is still pending rehearing and parties can appeal that order once the
Commission rules.


From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 03/12/2001 12:00 PM CST
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, jklauber@llgm.com, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Christian
Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FERC Order and DWR

Quick question to Joe and/or Christian, John and Mary:

I'm assuming that any deal we sign with DWR that falls below the $150/MWH
soft cap is free and clear of the order FERC issued on Friday as well as any
other refund risk associated with FERC's December order. Is that correct?
Thanks.

Best,
Jeff