|
|
Enron Mail |
Let's promote it in all these groups, just to be on the safe side.
Steve Walton 02/20/2001 09:06 AM To: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT cc: mhain@enron.com Subject: Re: Information Requirements Alan, I agree that we need to raise this issue in scheduling, ancillary services and congestion management content groups. In those groups we would be selling the concept. Actual implementation of the provisions would be in the tariff content group, where the actual requirements would be codified. This way it will be blessed by FERC and built into all operating protocols. Steve Alan Comnes 02/18/2001 01:17 PM To: steve.walton@enron.com, mhain@enron.com cc: Subject: Information Requirements Steve, Mary, Where in the RTO West process should Enron make its pitch for information transparency? To me, it would be part of the scheduling / ancillary services work group and part of congestion managment. I am assuming we do not want to leave it to Makret Monitoring because to get information release in real-time or near-real-time requires that information release systems get built into the actual RTO operational systems. At some point, we need to weigh in and try to get information release built into the Stage 2 filings. Thanks, Alan
|