Enron Mail

From:ehuff@llgm.com
To:dminson@aepnet.org, pcooper@aepnet.org, david.meyer@avistacorp.com,nolan.steiner@avistacorp.com, rich.stevens@avistacorp.com, dvermillion@avistaenergy.com, asettanni@bracepatt.com, dwatkiss@bracepatt.com, rcarroll@bracepatt.com, gfergus@brobeck.com,
Subject:Conference Call/PX Response
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Tue, 20 Mar 2001 11:59:00 -0800 (PST)

Attached you will find the draft of the Response of the Group to the Motion
for Relief from Stay filed by the Debtor. As an initial caveat, we have
prepared this as the scrivener for the Group. Like the rest of the Group, we
have not specifically reviewed the substance of this with our client and we
reserve the right to suggest changes based on our client's comments, as we
expect the rest of the Group will. In addition, we have the following
comments:

1. In carefully analyzing the Motion for Relief from Stay as part of
preparing this Response, we became convinced that the Debtor meant that the
preliminary injunction was to remain effective and does not intend to grant
general relief from stay as to the Federal District Court action. It seems
to us that the Debtor is basically saying by this motion that we should
proceed in front of FERC, but nobody has the prerogative, without seeking
further relief of stay from the court, to proceed outside of FERC to resolve
the charge-back issues. Accordingly, we did not feel it was appropriate to
address this issue in the response. The Group may want to consider
approaching Debtor's counsel on this issue.

2. Technically, by asking the Court to include the Amendment 22 proceeding
as part of the Relief from Stay, we are expanding the relief. We have tried
to soft sell this issue as was suggested by the Group to suggest that this is
simply a related proceeding that is required to go forward to grant complete
relief as part of the Debtor's motion. If the Debtor objects to the expanded
relief, the court will likely not grant it because it was not specifically
the subject of the motion. We probably need to lobby Debtor's counsel to
help get this accomplished without the requirement of filing an additional
motion for relief.

3. Check Exhibit A to make sure that all parties are listed and the
appropriate counsel is listed. I am trying to simply list the "bankruptcy"
counsel so that Debtor's counsel knows initially who to contact if there is
any question relative to a party. We have not intentionally left anybody
off. If someone is missing, it is inadvertent and we will certainly add them
to the list.

If there are others of your Group who should receive this, please forward it
to the other members of group.

We have set up a conference call at 12:15 E.T. to discuss this matter. The
dial-in number is 1-800-569-0883. The confirmation number is 5096040. If
you have any questions prior to that time you may contact Carl Eklund in New
York at 212/424-8482 or Jim Huemoeller at 303/291-2632.


LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae


The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any
computer.

- PXResponse2.doc