|
|
Enron Mail |
request_number: PS-BPA:117, 119, 120, 121 and 122-
firstname: Steve lastname: Marshall e-mail: marss@perkinscoie.com directed_to: Peter J. Burger - LP-7 Office of General Counsel Bonneville Power Administration P.O. Box 3261 Portland, Oregon 97208-3621 exhibit_wp-02-e-: BPA-75 page_numbers: 4 request_text: PS-BPA:117, page 4, lines 6-7: Beginning at line 6 the=20 witnesses state =01&Tiered rates may be good for both BPA and the Northwest= =20 region, and should properly be explored=018. How do you propose properly= =20 exploring tiered rates? PS-BPA:119, page 4, lines 3-4: Beginning at line 3 the witnesses state=20 =01&During these unprecedented market conditions, BPA will continue to expl= ore=20 every potential avenue for finding solutions that are both fair and=20 practical.=018 Please give examples of such potential avenues. Would a ch= ange=20 in base rates during the five-year rate period be one such avenue? Would a= =20 change in the manner in which the CRACs are applied during the five-year ra= te=20 period be one such avenue? PS-BPA:120, page 4, lines 3-6: Beginning at line 3 the witnesses state=20 =01&During these unprecedented market conditions, BPA will continue to expl= ore=20 every potential avenue for finding solutions that are both fair and=20 practical. This certainly would not exclude tiered rates, though the regio= n=01, s historically strong opposition to tiered rates is a factor that cannot be= =20 ignored=018. Does the language =01&will continue=018 mean that BPA is curr= ently=20 exploring the use of tiered rates as a potential avenue for finding=20 solutions? If so, please provide all data, analysis and communications tha= t=20 make up this exploration. PS-BPA:121, page 4, lines 5-6: Beginning at line 5 the witnesses state =01= & . .=20 . though the region=01,s historically strong opposition to tiered rates . .= .=018. =20 Please provide all bases for this statement. PS-BPA:122, page 4, lines 5-6: Beginning at line 5 the witnesses state =01= & . .=20 . though the region=01,s historically strong opposition to tiered rates . .= .=018. =20 Please describe your use of the term =01®ion=018. Do you mean to imply = that the=20 opposition was a consensus of all parties in the region? If so, how did th= is=20 consensus manifest itself? If not, what parties composed this opposition? contact_name: Steve Marshall contact_address: Perkins Coie One Bellevue Center, Suite 1800 411 - 108th Avenue N.E. Bellevue, WA 98004 contact_phone: 425-453-7314 contact_email: marss@perkinscoie.com contact_fax: 425-453-7350 delivery_instructions: Please mail hard coies of data responses to Steve= =20 Marshall at the address above The following information is from the web server: 1. Logon: IUSR_GRANITE 2. Remote Host: seairon.perkinscoie.com 3. Remote IP Address: 38.169.150.2 4. Form URL: =20 https://secure.bpa.gov/power/secure/psp/ratecase/discovery/wp_02_request.ht= ml 5. Browser Client: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT)
|