Enron Mail

From:douglass@arterhadden.com
To:susan.j.mara@enron.com, foothill@lmi.net
Subject:Re: Response to ISO Report -- CALM DOWN
Cc:barbara_klemstine@apses.com, robert_anderson@apses.com, berry@apx.com,dpurdum@apx.com, jcrowe@apx.com, lfisher@apx.com, efmosey@bpa.gov, mshansen@bpa.gov, billr@calpine.com, jackp@calpine.com, joer@calpine.com, cabaker@duke-energy.com, gavaughn@duke-e
Bcc:barbara_klemstine@apses.com, robert_anderson@apses.com, berry@apx.com,dpurdum@apx.com, jcrowe@apx.com, lfisher@apx.com, efmosey@bpa.gov, mshansen@bpa.gov, billr@calpine.com, jackp@calpine.com, joer@calpine.com, cabaker@duke-energy.com, gavaughn@duke-e
Date:Fri, 2 Mar 2001 06:12:00 -0800 (PST)

Great analogy, Sue.

<<< <Susan.J.Mara@enron.com< 03/02/01 09:34AM <<<

I think risk can be pretty easily explained as similar to getting a credit
card when you have shakey credit.? You can do it, but you're going to pay a
helluva high interest rate. The ISO has shakey credit and has to pay a
higher price because the sellers (credit card issuers) build in a risk
premium.? I think even reporters could understand this.

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854


??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
????????
??????????????????? Gary
Ackerman?????????????????????????????????????????????????????
??????????????????? <foothill@lmi??????? To:????
Susan.J.Mara@enron.com???????????????
??????????????????? .net<??????????????? cc:???? "Klemstine, Barbara
A(F56661)"???????
???????????????????????????????????????? <barbara_klemstine@apses.com<,
robert berry??
??????????????????? 03/01/2001?????????? <berry@apx.com<, Bill
Ross???????????????????
??????????????????? 07:04 PM???????????? <billr@calpine.com<, Carolyn
Baker???????????
??????????????????? Please?????????????? <cabaker@duke-energy.com<, CHARLES
A MIESSNER
??????????????????? respond to?????????? <camiessn@newwestenergy.com<,
carol clawson??
??????????????????? foothill???????????? <carol_clawson@fpl.com<, "Richard
H.?????????
???????????????????????????????????????? Counihan"
<counihan@greenmountain.com<,??????
???????????????????????????????????????? Curtis
Kebler????????????????????????????????
????????????????????????????????????????
<Curtis_L_Kebler@reliantenergy.com<, curt????
???????????????????????????????????????? hatton <curt.hatton@neg.pge.com<,
Dan Pigeon?
???????????????????????????????????????? <Dan_Pigeon@transalta.com<, Dan
Douglass?????
???????????????????????????????????????? <douglass@arterhadden.com<, Denice
Cazalet???
???????????????????????????????????????? Purdum <dpurdum@apx.com<, Dace
Udris?????????
???????????????????????????????????????? <dudris@smud.org<, Ed
Mosey??????????????????
???????????????????????????????????????? <efmosey@bpa.gov<, George
Vaughn?????????????
???????????????????????????????????????? <gavaughn@duke-energy.com<, Greg
Blue????????
???????????????????????????????????????? <gtbl@dynegy.com<, Jack
Pigott???????????????
???????????????????????????????????????? <jackp@calpine.com<, Jan
Mitchell????????????
???????????????????????????????????????? <jan.mitchell@pacificorp.com<,
Corby Gardin??
???????????????????????????????????????? <jcgardin@newwestenergy.com<, Jeff
Crowe?????
???????????????????????????????????????? <jcrowe@apx.com<, Joe
Ronan??????????????????
???????????????????????????????????????? <joer@calpine.com<, John
Fistolera???????????
???????????????????????????????????????? <johnf@ncpa.com<, John
Sousa?????????????????
???????????????????????????????????????? <joso@dynegy.com<, Janie
Mollon??????????????
???????????????????????????????????????? <jsmollon@newwestenergy.com<, Julie
Gentz????
???????????????????????????????????????? <julie.gentz@williams.com<, Karen
Denne??????
???????????????????????????????????????? <kdenne@enron.com<, Kelly
Swan???????????????
???????????????????????????????????????? <kelly.swan@williams.com<, Lynn
Lednicky?????
???????????????????????????????????????? <LALE@dynegy.com<, Lynn
Fisher???????????????
???????????????????????????????????????? <lfisher@apx.com<, Mark
Stutz????????????????
???????????????????????????????????????? <mark.stutz@xcelenergy.com<, Toni
Amendolia??
???????????????????????????????????????? <mozart@pwrteam.com<, Mike
Hansen????????????
???????????????????????????????????????? <mshansen@bpa.gov<, Nam
Nguyen???????????????
???????????????????????????????????????? <Nam.Nguyen@powersrc.com<, Paula
Hall-Collins
???????????????????????????????????????? <paula.hall-collins@williams.com<,
Richard???
????????????????????????????????????????
Wheatley?????????????????????????????????????
????????????????????????????????????????
<richard_n_wheatley@reliantenergy.com<, Randy
???????????????????????????????????????? Hickok <rjhickok@duke-energy.com<,
Rob Lamkin
???????????????????????????????????????? <rllamkin@seiworldwide.com<, Bob
Anderson????
???????????????????????????????????????? <Robert_Anderson@apses.com<, Roger
Pelote????
???????????????????????????????????????? <roger.pelote@williams.com<, Rob
Nichol??????
???????????????????????????????????????? <rsnichol@newwestenergy.com<,
Sandra?????????
???????????????????????????????????????? McDonough
<Sandra.McDonough@neg.pge.com<, Sue
???????????????????????????????????????? Mara <smara@enron.com<, Steve
Roalstad???????
???????????????????????????????????????? <steve.roalstad@xcelenergy.com<,
Tom Williams
????????????????????????????????????????
<tcwillia@duke-energy.com<,??????????????????
????????????????????????????????????????
Mary.Hain@enron.com??????????????????????????
???????????????????????????????????????? Subject:???? Re: Response to ISO
Report --???
???????????????????????????????????????? CALM
DOWN????????????????????????????????????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
????????



Dear Sue and Folks,

There is an aspect to this whole episode of which we should not lose sight.
The public
has been hearing from us for months that the market price is the result of
cost factors,
mainly natural gas and emission costs. Those are valid, but we never said
anything about
risk premiums because they were nill.?? Now, the ersatz ISO study pokes a
hole through
that, and we need to explain the "risk" factors that weren't predominant
even six months
ago.? It wouldn't have mattered if we had said from the outset; "It's gas,
plus emission,
plus risk factors".? No one would have understood.? But now the public is
wondering if we
are to explain away the price difference as risk, something that is
terribly hard to
measure, much less explain, then what next?? Is there always another cost
factor that our
side can come up with to justify the market prices?? From the public
perception point of
view, we have our hands full, and I think we should be cognizant of that
angle.? Listen,
half the public still believes there is no capacity shortage.? So why
should we expect
them to believe there is risk?

So, I agree that we need to hammer on the the seller's risk issue, but
don't expect
tomorrow to be sweet.? And we need more talking points, and items with
which we can use
to discredit the ISO analysis.? That's why I asked for additional
analytical help.? All
the public will understand is that the ISO did a study, and we did .....
I wonder if
we can explain the ISO model as similar to someone trying to explain the
NYSE index using
long-run historical P/E ratios.? That simple model hasn't worked.? Is the
NYSE an
irrational market?
gba

Susan.J.Mara@enron.com wrote:

< Gary and People,
<
< here is my view.? this is a FERC issue.? the ISO wants data.? Under the
< ferc order, ferc gets the data, not the ISO, not the EOB and not Governor
< Davis.? FERC will decide the issue.
<
< Re the report, i didn;t see anything new there.? AN old story.? FERC has
< the data and is determining whether there is any abuse.? The ISO just
isn't
< happy about being on the outside looking in.? There's no big story here.
< We don't usually have press conferences on something like this -- a
< disaggreement at FERC about who does what.?? And I don't think we spend
any
< more time on it than that.? Gov Davis is using the ISO to divert
attention
< from the real problems -- nobody likes his idea about? buying the
< transmission lines and he isn't fixing the problems in CA.
<
< WE SHOULD HAMMER ON THE FACT THAT THE REPORT AND THE FILING FAIL TO
ADDRESS
< THE SINGLE BIGGEST ISSUE -- CREDIT WORTHY STATUS OF THE ISO AND THE
< UTILITIES. Therefore it has zero credibility -- an obvious political
< attempt to divert attention.
<