Enron Mail

From:valarie.sabo@enron.com
To:mary.hain@enron.com
Subject:Re: WSPP report for 3rd quarter
Cc:linda.lawrence@enron.com, duong.luu@enron.com, leslie.reeves@enron.com,monica.lande@enron.com, tim.belden@enron.com, christi.nicolay@enron.com, stacey.white@enron.com, cara.semperger@enron.com
Bcc:linda.lawrence@enron.com, duong.luu@enron.com, leslie.reeves@enron.com,monica.lande@enron.com, tim.belden@enron.com, christi.nicolay@enron.com, stacey.white@enron.com, cara.semperger@enron.com
Date:Wed, 25 Oct 2000 06:34:00 -0700 (PDT)

I think these are okay. Again, my reasoning is not based on a
ctrprty-by-ctrprty check, but rather because I researched the code and
criteria with the programmer and have been satisfied that the reports are
performing as they should. Part of the alarm on Q2 numbers was caused by us
not knowing which deals were included under the "WSPP" contract and trying to
tie out with a different data pull.

The only questions that remain for me are: how is the decision made to
include deals under the "contract number?" How does that decision process
get passed on to people as employees change? What is automated about it?

My questions should not imply that I think the process is awry - I simply
don't have enough of an understanding of the process to adequately answer
those questions.