|
|
Enron Mail |
seems to address all important considerations. i would vote (manually) for a
consistent apporach across all ETS managed activities. however i think it will receive resistence by selected project engineers - who tend to anly take respeonsiblity for a single facet of a project and not the whole project; and may think it slow down an already slow approval process Rod Hayslett 11/20/2000 07:27 AM To: Denis Tu/FGT/Enron@ENRON, David Rosenberg/FGT/Enron@ENRON, James Centilli/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave Waymire/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Cheryl Perchal/NPNG/Enron@ENRON cc: Jerry Peters/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, James Saunders/FGT/Enron@ENRON Subject: Statement of Work Template, Etc. What do you think about using something like this proposal for most of our major projects (over $1.0 MM), could even go lower? This has been proposed by Morris specifically for EOTT projects, but there is no reason to exclude others. ---------------------- Forwarded by Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron on 11/20/2000 07:25 AM --------------------------- 11/15/2000 10:09 AM Morris Brassfield Morris Brassfield Morris Brassfield 11/15/2000 10:09 AM 11/15/2000 10:09 AM To: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Statement of Work Template, Etc. What do you think about using this proposed document for approving any EOTT project that is outside the approved Project budget plan? Here's my attempt at the template:
|