Enron Mail

From:barbara.gray@enron.com
To:dan.hyvl@enron.com
Subject:ATTORNEY/CLIENT COMMUNICATION//////CONFIDENTIAL and Privileged
Cc:jeffrey.hodge@enron.com, sandi.braband@enron.com, thomas.martin@enron.com,nelson.ferries@enron.com, jean.mrha@enron.com, frank.vickers@enron.com, jill.zivley@enron.com, gary.bryan@enron.com
Bcc:jeffrey.hodge@enron.com, sandi.braband@enron.com, thomas.martin@enron.com,nelson.ferries@enron.com, jean.mrha@enron.com, frank.vickers@enron.com, jill.zivley@enron.com, gary.bryan@enron.com
Date:Thu, 7 Jun 2001 11:07:00 -0700 (PDT)

Article II of the NONCOMPETITION AGREEMENT entered in connection with the
sale of HPL to AEP (which closed as of June 1,2001) provides:

"ENA [for 3 months post-close] will not solicit, negotiate or enter into
any contract, agreement or arrangement for the purchase of natural gas on the
HPL Pipeline from any Person which is a supplier or producer of natural gas
connected to the HPL Facilities; provided, however, nothing herein shall be
construed or interpreted as prohibiting ENA from entering into any such
contract, agreement or arrangement which is less than one month in duration
and involves or is related to an Enron Online transaction."

This is not the most clearly drafted provision as it was the subject of much
negotiation....and was significantly narrowed from the original scope
proposed by AEP. Thus, please consult with me prior to entering into any
solicitation, agreement or arrangement which might arguably be covered by our
limited covenant not to compete on the supply side for 3 months. There are
many aspects of the post-close transition which will require cooperation
between Enron and AEP/HPL and thus, it behoves us to carefully weigh the
risks and rewards of "stepping too close to or over the line".

Further,although a technical reading of the non-competition agreement only
applies to ENA, no ENA UPSTREAM deals which would violate this covenant if
there were to be done as ENA should be done without clearance from Brian
Redmond and me.

Please communicate this restriction to those who report to you and have need
to be aware of this limited restriction.

Sincerely
BNG





Dan J Hyvl
06/07/2001 04:59 PM

To: Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: ONEOK Energy Marketing and Trading Company

Barbara,
This appears to be supply deal for deliveries at Katy that would be subject
to the 90 day non-compete. Sandi is in the process of getting me a copy of
the non-compete so that I can determine if this deal is covered. Do you have
any thoughts.
----- Forwarded by Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT on 06/07/2001 04:56 PM -----

Richard Deming/ENRON@enronXgate
06/07/2001 02:22 PM

To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: ONEOK Energy Marketing and Trading Company

Dan,

Please find below details of Phy Gas deals with GTC agreements:

Deal Date: 6/06/01
Deal No: VF1896 / 835431
Buyer: ENA
Seller: ONEOK Energy Marketing and Trading Company
Start Date: 7/01/01
End Date: 6/30/02
Firm
Volume: 10,000 / day
Price: HOU.SHIP-LGPKG.IF.M.I minus USD 0.03000
Delivery Point: Exxon Katy - Katy Tailgate

Please let me know if you need any more details.

Thanks,
Richard
x54886