![]() |
Enron Mail |
Andy Lang thinks Nisource management may be receptive to considering some
joint participation with respect to the Reliant disposition. Nisource has been in the data room for an early look at Reliant's two LDC's, but discussions broke down (possibly they had enough to worry about with Columbia?). Anyway, I have been thinking about an Enron/Nisource JV structure for the Reliant deal that would seemingly accomplish a number of objectives for both companies. The valuations are preliminary and the structure could be adjusted a number of ways, but at least it is food for thought. I discussed this briefly with Brian Redmond and Tim Detmering this afternoon. They expressed interest in the unregulated storage (TPC/MHP) at Egan and Moss Bluff, which by the way, is NOT officially for sale, but are somewhat cool on the regulated storage that IS INCLUDED in the disposition. Tim said that as a result of the Nisource/Columbia merger, he had intended to ask Mark Metts to cycle with you and Cliff Baxter to discuss how best to approach Nisource looking for ways to improve the ENA service contract with Columbia. If such a meeting were to take place, perhaps there would be a natural opportunity to explore a JV concept. Attached is a description of the JV for your review and comment. JNG
|