|
|
Enron Mail |
The question below was forwarded to me by Aquila. The question (in red) is from PPL. What would be TW's strategy and can someone get back with PPL?
thanks kh -----Original Message----- From: Cook, Mark [mailto:MCook@utilicorp.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 4:05 PM To: Hyatt, Kevin Subject: FW: Red Lake Info -----Original Message----- From: Bohne, Kevin Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 2:31 PM To: Cook, Mark Subject: FW: Red Lake Info -----Original Message----- From: dlsmith@pplweb.com [mailto:dlsmith@pplweb.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 2:31 PM To: KBohne@utilicorp.com Subject: RE: Red Lake Info Kevin, thanks for the document we will have it reviewed in the event PPL opts to use it to meet any credit requirements. I do have one question that might have been addressed at the informational sessions. Based on the open season documents, Red Lake will interconnect with both El Paso and TW at a minimum, with other points to be determined based on interest. I was wondering if there had been any discussions with either pipeline about the impact of adding this interconnection. I know that may be a loaded questions, but based on historic flows, in order to guarantee firm deliveries from that receipt point, a shipper would have to move its primary receipt point to the Red Lake interconnection (from say San Juan or East of Thoreau areas on TW) or negotiate alternate arrangements with the pipelines. Sorry for the rambling question, but in valuating the asset, the question of transportation inevitably comes up. Thanks David -----Original Message----- From: KBohne@utilicorp.com [mailto:KBohne@utilicorp.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 3:11 PM To: Smith, David L. Subject: Red Lake Info David, Here is the form that I promised. I hope that this helps and sorry for the inconvenience. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any other questions. <<Red Lake Gas Storage Agreement.doc<< Kevin P. Bohne Aquila (816) 701-6298 kbohne@utilicorp.com
|