|
|
Enron Mail |
Cc: jeff.donahue@enron.com, todd.busby@enron.com, dan.hyvl@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: jeff.donahue@enron.com, todd.busby@enron.com, dan.hyvl@enron.com X-From: Ruth Concannon X-To: mrosenberg@sithe.com, joliver@sithe.com, bhughes@sithe.com, bfernandez@sithe.com, lmessina@sithe.com, slee@sithe.com, jmaher@sithe.com, skhawaja@sithe.com, tdeleo@sithe.com X-cc: Jeff Donahue, Todd Busby, Dan J Hyvl X-bcc: X-Folder: \Dan_Hyvl_Dec2000_June2001\Notes Folders\All documents X-Origin: HYVL-D X-FileName: dhyvl.nsf Attached is a draft transaction agreement for October 2000, the assumed maintenance month during the MW Turndown time period. The boiler-plate language is identical to the document sent to you earlier. The only changes are to the DCQ, Delivery Points, and Contract Price language for Part I. These changes incorporate Sithe's concerns that the month of October should be divided in two parts, one when the full plant is available and the other when the only one block is available. For invoicing purposes, it has been assumed the GSA sales reduction tied to one block being down for 15 days would keep ENA whole for what the GSA sales volumes would have been if there had not been a MW Turndown transaction. We have not yet verified if this is an accurate assumption, so some additional adjustments to the volumes/time period may still be required. Ruth
|