|
|
Enron Mail |
Dear Mr. Hyvl: I'm re-sending the e-mail, because I had used
dan.hyvl@enron.com <mailto:dan.hyvl@enron.com< and it came back undelivered. I received your correct e-mail from Robert Bruce later. Grant Kolling. -----Original Message----- From: Kolling, Grant Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 12:25 PM To: 'robert.bruce@enron.com'; 'dan.hyvl@enron.com' Cc: Padilla, Monica; Balachandran, Girish Subject: Draft Resolution Importance: High Dear Mr. Bruce and Mr. Hyvl: In response to Mr. Bruce's telephone call of this morning, attached for your consideration is a draft resolution, which the City proposes to substitute for the opinion of counsel letter in connection with the Enfolio contract with Enron North America Corp. As I have mentioned to both of you, the City Attorney is not inclined to execute the opinion of counsel letter as proposed. The City does not issue such opinions whenever it has negotiated energy contracts in the past. Whenever the City Attorney has issued opinions of counsel in connection with revenue bond issues, those opinions of counsel have been quite limited in scope. I had asked my legal assistant to fax this document before I spoke to Robert Bruce this morning, but this e-mail may arrive before the fax. Please note that the City's staff has not reviewed or commented on this draft resolution, so there may well be changes. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, s/ Grant Kolling Senior Asst. City Attorney <<EnronReso.doc<< - EnronReso.doc
|